TSTP Solution File: SYN097-1.002 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:50:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 46
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 59 ( 7 unt; 38 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 16 ~; 18 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 39 ( 38 usr; 39 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
u_1: $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
p_1_2: $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
u_2: $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
p_2_2: $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
p_1_1: $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
u_3: $o ).
tff(decl_28,type,
q_2_2: $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
q_1_1: $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
u_4: $o ).
tff(decl_31,type,
q_1_2: $o ).
tff(decl_32,type,
u_5: $o ).
tff(decl_33,type,
u_6: $o ).
tff(decl_34,type,
u_7: $o ).
tff(decl_35,type,
u_8: $o ).
tff(decl_36,type,
u_9: $o ).
tff(decl_37,type,
u_10: $o ).
tff(decl_38,type,
u_11: $o ).
tff(decl_39,type,
u_12: $o ).
tff(decl_40,type,
u_13: $o ).
tff(decl_41,type,
sym_u_1: $o ).
tff(decl_42,type,
sym_p_1_2: $o ).
tff(decl_43,type,
sym_u_2: $o ).
tff(decl_44,type,
sym_p_2_2: $o ).
tff(decl_45,type,
sym_p_1_1: $o ).
tff(decl_46,type,
sym_u_3: $o ).
tff(decl_47,type,
sym_q_2_2: $o ).
tff(decl_48,type,
sym_q_1_1: $o ).
tff(decl_49,type,
sym_u_4: $o ).
tff(decl_50,type,
sym_q_1_2: $o ).
tff(decl_51,type,
sym_u_5: $o ).
tff(decl_52,type,
sym_u_6: $o ).
tff(decl_53,type,
sym_u_7: $o ).
tff(decl_54,type,
sym_u_8: $o ).
tff(decl_55,type,
sym_u_9: $o ).
tff(decl_56,type,
sym_u_10: $o ).
tff(decl_57,type,
sym_u_11: $o ).
tff(decl_58,type,
sym_u_12: $o ).
tff(decl_59,type,
sym_u_13: $o ).
cnf(u_s2_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
( u_1
| ~ p_1_2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_s2_goal_1) ).
cnf(u_1_s2_goal_1,axiom,
~ u_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_1_s2_goal_1) ).
cnf(u_12_t2_3,axiom,
( p_2_2
| ~ u_12 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_12_t2_3) ).
cnf(u_t2_3,axiom,
( u_12
| p_2_2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_t2_3) ).
cnf(u_10_t2_1,axiom,
( p_1_1
| ~ u_10 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_10_t2_1) ).
cnf(u_t2_1,axiom,
( u_10
| p_1_1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_t2_1) ).
cnf(u_2_s2_type11_1,axiom,
( p_1_2
| ~ u_2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_2_s2_type11_1) ).
cnf(u_s2_type11_1,axiom,
( u_2
| p_1_2
| ~ p_2_2
| ~ p_1_1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_s2_type11_1) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( u_1
| ~ p_1_2 ),
u_s2_goal_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
~ u_1,
u_1_s2_goal_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( p_2_2
| ~ u_12 ),
u_12_t2_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( u_12
| p_2_2 ),
u_t2_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( p_1_1
| ~ u_10 ),
u_10_t2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( u_10
| p_1_1 ),
u_t2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( p_1_2
| ~ u_2 ),
u_2_s2_type11_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_2,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( u_2
| p_1_2
| ~ p_2_2
| ~ p_1_1 ),
u_s2_type11_1 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
p_2_2,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
p_1_1,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ u_2,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_15]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 21:43:42 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.60 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.62 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.22/0.62 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.22/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.62 % Total time : 0.003000 s
% 0.22/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.62 % Total time : 0.006000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------