TSTP Solution File: SYN097-1.002 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN097-1.002 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:31:50 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 0.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP26091/SYN/SYN097-1.002+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19] [nf = 0] [nu = 7] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66] [nf = 16] [nu = 26] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 161] [nf = 32] [nu = 45] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 280] [nf = 64] [nu = 64] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 399] [nf = 96] [nu = 83] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 518] [nf = 128] [nu = 102] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 637] [nf = 160] [nu = 121] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 756] [nf = 192] [nu = 140] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 875] [nf = 224] [nu = 159] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 994] [nf = 256] [nu = 178] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1113] [nf = 288] [nu = 197] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1232] [nf = 320] [nu = 216] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1351] [nf = 352] [nu = 235] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1470] [nf = 384] [nu = 254] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1589] [nf = 416] [nu = 273] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1708] [nf = 448] [nu = 292] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1827] [nf = 480] [nu = 311] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1946] [nf = 512] [nu = 330] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2065] [nf = 544] [nu = 349] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2184] [nf = 576] [nu = 368] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2303] [nf = 608] [nu = 387] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2422] [nf = 640] [nu = 406] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2541] [nf = 672] [nu = 425] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2660] [nf = 704] [nu = 444] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2779] [nf = 736] [nu = 463] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2898] [nf = 768] [nu = 482] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3017] [nf = 800] [nu = 501] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3136] [nf = 832] [nu = 520] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3255] [nf = 864] [nu = 539] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3374] [nf = 896] [nu = 558] [ut = 16]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3393] [nf = 896] [nu = 565] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3440] [nf = 912] [nu = 584] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3535] [nf = 928] [nu = 603] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3654] [nf = 960] [nu = 622] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3773] [nf = 992] [nu = 641] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3892] [nf = 1024] [nu = 660] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4011] [nf = 1056] [nu = 679] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4130] [nf = 1088] [nu = 698] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4249] [nf = 1120] [nu = 717] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4368] [nf = 1152] [nu = 736] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4487] [nf = 1184] [nu = 755] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4606] [nf = 1216] [nu = 774] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4725] [nf = 1248] [nu = 793] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4844] [nf = 1280] [nu = 812] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4963] [nf = 1312] [nu = 831] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5082] [nf = 1344] [nu = 850] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5201] [nf = 1376] [nu = 869] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5320] [nf = 1408] [nu = 888] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5439] [nf = 1440] [nu = 907] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5558] [nf = 1472] [nu = 926] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5677] [nf = 1504] [nu = 945] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5796] [nf = 1536] [nu = 964] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5915] [nf = 1568] [nu = 983] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6034] [nf = 1600] [nu = 1002] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6153] [nf = 1632] [nu = 1021] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6272] [nf = 1664] [nu = 1040] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6391] [nf = 1696] [nu = 1059] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6510] [nf = 1728] [nu = 1078] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6629] [nf = 1760] [nu = 1097] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6748] [nf = 1792] [nu = 1116] [ut = 16]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 8540
% resolvents: 6748 factors: 1792
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1116
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 13.07
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [1] = 6 [2] = 8
% Total = 16
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1116 [2] = 2944 [3] = 4480
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] p_1_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] p_2_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] q_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [4] q_1_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] q_2_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] sym_p_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [7] sym_p_1_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [8] sym_p_2_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [9] sym_q_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [10] sym_q_1_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] sym_q_2_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [12] sym_u_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [13] sym_u_10 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] sym_u_11 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] sym_u_12 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] sym_u_13 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] sym_u_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [18] sym_u_3 (+)1 (-)0
% [19] sym_u_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] sym_u_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] sym_u_6 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] sym_u_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] sym_u_8 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] sym_u_9 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] u_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [26] u_10 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] u_11 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] u_12 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] u_13 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] u_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [31] u_3 (+)0 (-)1
% [32] u_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] u_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] u_6 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] u_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] u_8 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] u_9 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)8 (-)8
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 16
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1472
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1344
% Number of successful unifications: 8540
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 64380
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 518904
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 24
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 72
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 8540
% ConstructUnitClause() = 38
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.21 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------