TSTP Solution File: SYN092-1.003 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN092-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 2.77s 1.82s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SYN092-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:39:24 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.77/1.82  
% 2.77/1.82  % SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.77/1.82  
% 2.77/1.82  Inference rules
% 2.77/1.82  ----------------------
% 2.77/1.82  #Ref     : 0
% 2.77/1.82  #Sup     : 0
% 2.77/1.82  #Fact    : 0
% 2.77/1.82  #Define  : 0
% 2.77/1.82  #Split   : 18
% 2.77/1.82  #Chain   : 0
% 2.77/1.82  #Close   : 0
% 2.77/1.82  
% 2.77/1.82  Ordering : KBO
% 2.77/1.82  
% 2.77/1.82  Simplification rules
% 2.77/1.82  ----------------------
% 2.77/1.82  #Subsume      : 17
% 2.77/1.82  #Demod        : 15
% 2.77/1.82  #Tautology    : 4
% 2.77/1.82  #SimpNegUnit  : 19
% 2.77/1.82  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.77/1.82  
% 2.77/1.82  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.77/1.82  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.77/1.82  
% 2.77/1.82  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.77/1.82  ----------------------
% 2.77/1.83  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 2.77/1.83  Parsing              : 0.25
% 2.77/1.83  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.77/1.83  Main loop            : 0.21
% 2.77/1.83  Inferencing          : 0.04
% 2.77/1.83  Reduction            : 0.06
% 2.77/1.83  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 2.77/1.83  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 2.77/1.83  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.77/1.83  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.77/1.83  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.77/1.83  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.77/1.83  Total                : 0.70
% 2.77/1.83  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.77/1.83  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.77/1.83  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.77/1.83  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------