TSTP Solution File: SYN089-1.002 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN089-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:23:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.58s 1.78s
% Output   : Refutation 1.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   4 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ p_1_2,
    file('SYN089-1.002.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( p_1_2
    | ~ p_2_2
    | ~ p_1_1 ),
    file('SYN089-1.002.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,plain,
    ( ~ p_2_2
    | ~ p_1_1
    | p_1_2 ),
    inference(propositional,[status(thm)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[2])]),
    [iquote('copy,2,propositional')] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    p_1_1,
    file('SYN089-1.002.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    p_2_2,
    file('SYN089-1.002.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    p_1_2,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,3,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,3,10')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[15,1]),
    [iquote('binary,15.1,1.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN089-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:02:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.58/1.78  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.58/1.78  The process was started by sandbox2 on n009.cluster.edu,
% 1.58/1.78  Wed Jul 27 11:02:21 2022
% 1.58/1.78  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 4474.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.58/1.78  set(auto).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.58/1.78  clear(print_given).
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  list(usable).
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] -p_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] p_1_2| -p_2_2| -p_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] p_1_2| -q_2_2| -q_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] q_1_2| -p_2_2| -q_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] q_1_2| -q_2_2| -p_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] p_1_1| -p_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] q_1_1| -q_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] p_2_2| -p_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] q_2_2| -q_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] p_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] q_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] p_2_2.
% 1.58/1.78  0 [] q_2_2.
% 1.58/1.78  end_of_list.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  SCAN INPUT: prop=1, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  The clause set is propositional; the strategy will be
% 1.58/1.78  ordered hyperresolution with the propositional
% 1.58/1.78  optimizations, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: set(propositional).
% 1.58/1.78     dependent: set(sort_literals).
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  ------------> process usable:
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 1 [] -p_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [copy,2,propositional] -p_2_2| -p_1_1|p_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [copy,4,propositional] -q_2_2| -q_1_1|p_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [copy,6,propositional] -p_2_2| -q_1_1|q_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 9 [copy,8,propositional] -p_1_1| -q_2_2|q_1_2.
% 1.58/1.78    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [propositional] -p_1_2|p_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78    Following clause subsumed by 0 during input processing: 0 [propositional] -q_1_2|q_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [propositional] -p_1_2|p_2_2.
% 1.58/1.78    Following clause subsumed by 0 during input processing: 0 [propositional] -q_1_2|q_2_2.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  ------------> process sos:
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 10 [] p_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 11 [] q_1_1.
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 12 [] p_2_2.
% 1.58/1.78  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 13 [] q_2_2.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 16 [binary,15.1,1.1] $F.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.58/1.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.58/1.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.58/1.78  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  ============ end of search ============
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.58/1.78  clauses given                  3
% 1.58/1.78  clauses generated              2
% 1.58/1.78  clauses kept                  11
% 1.58/1.78  clauses forward subsumed       4
% 1.58/1.78  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.58/1.78  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.58/1.78  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.58/1.78  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.58/1.78  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.58/1.78  
% 1.58/1.78  Process 4474 finished Wed Jul 27 11:02:22 2022
% 1.58/1.78  Otter interrupted
% 1.58/1.78  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------