TSTP Solution File: SYN089-1.002 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN089-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:45 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.32s 300.33s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 4 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(s2_type11_1,axiom,
( p_1_2
| ~ p_2_2
| ~ p_1_1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e69GL4TUk1/E---3.1_2475.p',s2_type11_1) ).
cnf(t2_3,axiom,
p_2_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e69GL4TUk1/E---3.1_2475.p',t2_3) ).
cnf(t2_1,axiom,
p_1_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e69GL4TUk1/E---3.1_2475.p',t2_1) ).
cnf(s2_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e69GL4TUk1/E---3.1_2475.p',s2_goal_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( p_1_2
| ~ p_2_2
| ~ p_1_1 ),
s2_type11_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
p_2_2,
t2_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
p_1_1,
t2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ p_1_2,
s2_goal_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN089-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:27:21 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e69GL4TUk1/E---3.1_2475.p
% 0.32/300.33 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.32/300.33 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/300.33 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # new_bool_1 with pid 2561 completed with status 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.32/300.33 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/300.33 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.32/300.33 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.32/300.33 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2566 completed with status 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.32/300.33 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/300.33 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.32/300.33 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.32/300.33 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.32/300.33 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.32/300.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.32/300.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.32/300.33
% 0.32/300.33 # Proof found!
% 0.32/300.33 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.32/300.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/300.33 # Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.32/300.33 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.32/300.33 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.32/300.33 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.32/300.33 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.32/300.33 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.32/300.33 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # NegExts : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/300.33 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/300.33 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.32/300.33 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/300.33 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/300.33 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.32/300.33 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.32/300.33 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.32/300.33 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.32/300.33 # ...number of literals in the above : 9
% 0.32/300.33 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.32/300.33 # Termbank termtop insertions : 126
% 0.32/300.33
% 0.32/300.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/300.33 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.32/300.33 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.32/300.33 # Total time : 0.002 s
% 0.32/300.33 # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.32/300.33
% 0.32/300.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/300.33 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.32/300.33 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.32/300.33 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.32/300.33 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.32/300.33 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.32/300.34 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------