TSTP Solution File: SYN089-1.002 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SYN089-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.29s 1.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 8 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 10 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 7 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 (; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp > q_2_2 > q_1_2 > q_1_1 > p_2_2 > p_1_2 > p_1_1
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(p_2_2,type,
p_2_2: $o ).
tff(q_1_1,type,
q_1_1: $o ).
tff(p_1_1,type,
p_1_1: $o ).
tff(p_1_2,type,
p_1_2: $o ).
tff(q_1_2,type,
q_1_2: $o ).
tff(q_2_2,type,
q_2_2: $o ).
tff(f_74,axiom,
q_2_2,
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_72,axiom,
q_1_1,
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_40,axiom,
( p_1_2
| ~ q_2_2
| ~ q_1_1 ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_26,axiom,
~ p_1_2,
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_26,plain,
q_2_2,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).
tff(c_22,plain,
q_1_1,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_72]) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
( ~ q_1_1
| ~ q_2_2
| p_1_2 ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_40]) ).
tff(c_36,plain,
p_1_2,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_26,c_22,c_6]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
~ p_1_2,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_2]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN089-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 17:31:37 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.29/1.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.55
% 2.29/1.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.37/1.58
% 2.37/1.58 Inference rules
% 2.37/1.58 ----------------------
% 2.37/1.58 #Ref : 0
% 2.37/1.58 #Sup : 0
% 2.37/1.58 #Fact : 0
% 2.37/1.58 #Define : 0
% 2.37/1.58 #Split : 0
% 2.37/1.58 #Chain : 0
% 2.37/1.58 #Close : 0
% 2.37/1.58
% 2.37/1.58 Ordering : KBO
% 2.37/1.58
% 2.37/1.58 Simplification rules
% 2.37/1.58 ----------------------
% 2.37/1.58 #Subsume : 6
% 2.37/1.58 #Demod : 15
% 2.37/1.58 #Tautology : 6
% 2.37/1.58 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.37/1.58 #BackRed : 0
% 2.37/1.58
% 2.37/1.58 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.37/1.58 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.37/1.58
% 2.37/1.58 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.37/1.58 ----------------------
% 2.37/1.59 Preprocessing : 0.37
% 2.37/1.59 Parsing : 0.20
% 2.37/1.59 CNF conversion : 0.01
% 2.37/1.59 Main loop : 0.06
% 2.37/1.59 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.37/1.59 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.37/1.59 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.37/1.59 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.37/1.59 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.37/1.59 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.37/1.59 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.37/1.59 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.37/1.59 Total : 0.48
% 2.37/1.59 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.37/1.59 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.37/1.59 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.37/1.59 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------