TSTP Solution File: SYN088-1.010 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN088-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:45 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 23 unt; 0 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 45 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 11 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-10 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(s4_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p(a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_goal_1) ).
cnf(s4_1,axiom,
( p(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10)
| ~ q_1(X1)
| ~ q_2(X2)
| ~ q_3(X3)
| ~ q_4(X4)
| ~ q_5(X5)
| ~ q_6(X6)
| ~ q_7(X7)
| ~ q_8(X8)
| ~ q_9(X9)
| ~ q_10(X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_1) ).
cnf(s4_20,axiom,
q_10(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_20) ).
cnf(s4_18,axiom,
q_9(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_18) ).
cnf(s4_16,axiom,
q_8(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_16) ).
cnf(s4_14,axiom,
q_7(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_14) ).
cnf(s4_12,axiom,
q_6(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_12) ).
cnf(s4_10,axiom,
q_5(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_10) ).
cnf(s4_8,axiom,
q_4(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_8) ).
cnf(s4_6,axiom,
q_3(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_6) ).
cnf(s4_4,axiom,
q_2(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_4) ).
cnf(s4_2,axiom,
q_1(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p',s4_2) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p(a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a,a),
s4_goal_1 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( p(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10)
| ~ q_1(X1)
| ~ q_2(X2)
| ~ q_3(X3)
| ~ q_4(X4)
| ~ q_5(X5)
| ~ q_6(X6)
| ~ q_7(X7)
| ~ q_8(X8)
| ~ q_9(X9)
| ~ q_10(X10) ),
s4_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
q_10(a),
s4_20 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
q_9(a),
s4_18 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
q_8(a),
s4_16 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
q_7(a),
s4_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
q_6(a),
s4_12 ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
q_5(a),
s4_10 ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
q_4(a),
s4_8 ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
q_3(a),
s4_6 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
q_2(a),
s4_4 ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
q_1(a),
s4_2 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : SYN088-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:52:21 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.fQ7P6Xp9c3/E---3.1_29560.p
% 0.16/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # new_bool_1 with pid 29640 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 29645 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Processed clauses : 44
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.16/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 288
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.16/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------