TSTP Solution File: SYN085-1.010 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:36:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 20 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 82 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 92 ( 43 ~; 41 |; 0 &)
% ( 8 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 20 ( 19 usr; 20 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f57,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f48,f49,f50,f51,f52,f53,f54,f55,f56]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
spl0_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> p_7 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
p_7,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_8) ).
fof(f55,plain,
spl0_8,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f6,f45]) ).
fof(f45,plain,
( spl0_8
<=> p_4 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
p_4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_5) ).
fof(f54,plain,
spl0_6,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f5,f37]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
( spl0_6
<=> p_3 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
p_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_4) ).
fof(f53,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> p_9 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
p_9,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_10) ).
fof(f52,plain,
spl0_5,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f3,f33]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
( spl0_5
<=> p_1 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
p_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_2) ).
fof(f51,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f7,f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> p_5 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
p_5,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_6) ).
fof(f50,plain,
~ spl0_4,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1,f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> p_0 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
~ p_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_goal_1) ).
fof(f49,plain,
spl0_7,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f41]) ).
fof(f41,plain,
( spl0_7
<=> p_6 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
p_6,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_7) ).
fof(f48,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3
| spl0_4
| ~ spl0_5
| ~ spl0_6
| ~ spl0_7
| ~ spl0_8 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f15,f45,f41,f37,f33,f29,f25,f21,f17]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( ~ p_4
| ~ p_6
| ~ p_3
| ~ p_1
| p_0
| ~ p_7
| ~ p_5
| ~ p_9 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
p_8,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_9) ).
fof(f14,plain,
( ~ p_8
| ~ p_1
| ~ p_9
| p_0
| ~ p_7
| ~ p_4
| ~ p_3
| ~ p_5
| ~ p_6 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f12]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
p_10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_11) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( ~ p_7
| ~ p_4
| ~ p_6
| p_0
| ~ p_3
| ~ p_10
| ~ p_8
| ~ p_1
| ~ p_9
| ~ p_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f2,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
p_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_3) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
( ~ p_1
| ~ p_4
| ~ p_2
| ~ p_9
| ~ p_8
| ~ p_3
| ~ p_10
| ~ p_7
| ~ p_6
| ~ p_5
| p_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 21:39:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.50 % (5094)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (5095)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (5104)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (5090)Success in time 0.164 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------