TSTP Solution File: SYN085-1.010 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:25:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   78 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  121 (  66   ~;  55   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;  12 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f22,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    p_4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_5) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ~ p_4,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f21,f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    p_6,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_7) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ~ p_6
    | ~ p_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f20,f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    p_5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_6) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( ~ p_5
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f11]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    p_9,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_10) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( ~ p_9
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    p_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_4) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( ~ p_3
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f17,f12]) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    p_10,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_11) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( ~ p_10
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    p_7,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_8) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ~ p_7
    | ~ p_10
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_9 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f15,f10]) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    p_8,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_9) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ~ p_8
    | ~ p_7
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_10
    | ~ p_9 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    p_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_2) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( ~ p_1
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_10
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_8
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_7 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    p_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_3) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ~ p_2
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_10
    | ~ p_7
    | ~ p_8
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_1
    | ~ p_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f2,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ~ p_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_goal_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ( ~ p_1
    | ~ p_10
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_7
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_8
    | ~ p_2
    | ~ p_3
    | p_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 21:41:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.48  % (9589)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  The problem is propositional so there are no sorts!
% 0.19/0.48  TRYING []
% 0.19/0.48  % (9589)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (9597)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (9570)Success in time 0.143 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------