TSTP Solution File: SYN085-1.010 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:23:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.90s 2.08s
% Output   : Refutation 1.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  21 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;  12 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ p_0,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( p_0
    | ~ p_1
    | ~ p_2
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_7
    | ~ p_8
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_10 ),
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,plain,
    ( ~ p_1
    | ~ p_2
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_7
    | ~ p_8
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_10
    | p_0 ),
    inference(propositional,[status(thm)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[2])]),
    [iquote('copy,2,propositional')] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    p_1,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    p_2,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    p_3,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    p_4,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    p_5,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    p_6,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    p_7,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    p_8,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    p_9,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    p_10,
    file('SYN085-1.010.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    p_0,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[14,1]),
    [iquote('binary,14.1,1.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:15:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.90/2.08  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.90/2.08  The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 1.90/2.08  Wed Jul 27 11:15:00 2022
% 1.90/2.08  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 3844.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.90/2.08  set(auto).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.90/2.08  clear(print_given).
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  list(usable).
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] -p_0.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_0| -p_1| -p_2| -p_3| -p_4| -p_5| -p_6| -p_7| -p_8| -p_9| -p_10.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_1.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_2.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_3.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_4.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_5.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_6.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_7.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_8.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_9.
% 1.90/2.08  0 [] p_10.
% 1.90/2.08  end_of_list.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  SCAN INPUT: prop=1, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  The clause set is propositional; the strategy will be
% 1.90/2.08  ordered hyperresolution with the propositional
% 1.90/2.08  optimizations, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: set(propositional).
% 1.90/2.08     dependent: set(sort_literals).
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  ------------> process usable:
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 1 [] -p_0.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 3 [copy,2,propositional] -p_1| -p_2| -p_3| -p_4| -p_5| -p_6| -p_7| -p_8| -p_9| -p_10|p_0.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  ------------> process sos:
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 4 [] p_1.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 5 [] p_2.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 6 [] p_3.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 7 [] p_4.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 8 [] p_5.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 9 [] p_6.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 10 [] p_7.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 11 [] p_8.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 12 [] p_9.
% 1.90/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 13 [] p_10.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 15 [binary,14.1,1.1] $F.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.90/2.08  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.90/2.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.90/2.08  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  ============ end of search ============
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.90/2.08  clauses given                 10
% 1.90/2.08  clauses generated              1
% 1.90/2.08  clauses kept                  13
% 1.90/2.08  clauses forward subsumed       0
% 1.90/2.08  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.90/2.08  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.90/2.08  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.90/2.08  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.90/2.08  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.90/2.08  
% 1.90/2.08  Process 3844 finished Wed Jul 27 11:15:01 2022
% 1.90/2.08  Otter interrupted
% 1.90/2.08  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------