TSTP Solution File: SYN085-1.010 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:44:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:22:42 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % File : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.21/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.21/0.61 % Problem : Plaisted problem s(1,10)
% 0.21/0.61 % Version : Biased.
% 0.21/0.61 % English :
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Refs : [Pla94] Plaisted (1994), The Search Efficiency of Theorem Prov
% 0.21/0.61 % Source : [Pla94]
% 0.21/0.61 % Names : S1n [Pla94]
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.61 % Rating : 0.33 v5.5.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.21/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of predicates : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.21/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_PRP
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Comments : Biased away from various calculi.
% 0.21/0.61 % : tptp2X: -f tptp -s10 SYN085-1.g
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 ~ p_0 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_1,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 ( p_0
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_1
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_2
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_3
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_4
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_5
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_6
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_7
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_8
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_9
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ p_10 ) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_2,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_1 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_3,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_2 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_4,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_3 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_5,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_4 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_6,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_5 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_7,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_6 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_8,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_7 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_9,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_8 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_10,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_9 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(s1_11,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 p_10 ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.61 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.61 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.21/0.61 %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.21/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.21/0.61 %SharedTerms:23
% 0.21/0.61 %goalClause: 11
% 0.21/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.21/0.61 [1]P1(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [2]P3(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [3]P5(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [4]P6(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [5]P7(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [6]P8(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [7]P9(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [8]P10(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [9]P11(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [10]P4(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [11]~P2(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 [12]P2(a500)+~P1(a500)+~P3(a500)+~P5(a500)+~P6(a500)+~P7(a500)+~P8(a500)+~P9(a500)+~P10(a500)+~P11(a500)+~P4(a500)
% 0.21/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62 cnf(13,plain,
% 0.21/0.62 ($false),
% 0.21/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12]),
% 0.21/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------