TSTP Solution File: SYN085-1.010 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:30:13 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28094/SYN/SYN085-1.010+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% +================================================+
% | |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% | |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: ~p_0
% B11: ~p_1 | ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 | p_0
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_1
% U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_10
% U3: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_2
% U4: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_3
% U5: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_4
% U6: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_5
% U7: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_6
% U8: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_7
% U9: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_8
% U10: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > p_9
% U11: < d10 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > ~p_9
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U1:
% p_1 ....... U1
% Derivation of unit clause U2:
% p_10 ....... U2
% Derivation of unit clause U3:
% p_2 ....... U3
% Derivation of unit clause U4:
% p_3 ....... U4
% Derivation of unit clause U5:
% p_4 ....... U5
% Derivation of unit clause U6:
% p_5 ....... U6
% Derivation of unit clause U7:
% p_6 ....... U7
% Derivation of unit clause U8:
% p_7 ....... U8
% Derivation of unit clause U9:
% p_8 ....... U9
% Derivation of unit clause U10:
% p_9 ....... U10
% Derivation of unit clause U11:
% ~p_0 ....... B0
% ~p_1 | ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 | p_0 ....... B11
% ~p_1 | ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R1 [B0:L0, B11:L10]
% p_1 ....... U1
% ~p_10 | ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0]
% p_10 ....... U2
% ~p_2 | ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R3 [R2:L0, U2:L0]
% p_2 ....... U3
% ~p_3 | ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R4 [R3:L0, U3:L0]
% p_3 ....... U4
% ~p_4 | ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R5 [R4:L0, U4:L0]
% p_4 ....... U5
% ~p_5 | ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R6 [R5:L0, U5:L0]
% p_5 ....... U6
% ~p_6 | ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R7 [R6:L0, U6:L0]
% p_6 ....... U7
% ~p_7 | ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R8 [R7:L0, U7:L0]
% p_7 ....... U8
% ~p_8 | ~p_9 ....... R9 [R8:L0, U8:L0]
% p_8 ....... U9
% ~p_9 ....... R10 [R9:L0, U9:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% ~p_9 ....... U11
% p_9 ....... U10
% [] ....... R1 [U11:L0, U10:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 21
% resolvents: 21 factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.76
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 11 [10] = 1
% Total = 12
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1 [2] = 1 [3] = 1 [4] = 1 [5] = 1 [6] = 1
% [7] = 1 [8] = 1 [9] = 1 [10] = 12
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] p_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] p_10 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] p_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [4] p_3 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] p_4 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] p_5 (+)1 (-)0
% [7] p_6 (+)1 (-)0
% [8] p_7 (+)1 (-)0
% [9] p_8 (+)1 (-)0
% [10] p_9 (+)1 (-)1
% ------------------
% Total: (+)10 (-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 12
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 99
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 31
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 120
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 31
% ConstructUnitClause() = 1
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 1 secs
% CPU time: 0.14 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------