TSTP Solution File: SYN085-1.010 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:34 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.08s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  24 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (  22   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;  12 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp > p_9 > p_8 > p_7 > p_6 > p_5 > p_4 > p_3 > p_2 > p_10 > p_1 > p_0

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(p_2,type,
    p_2: $o ).

tff(p_9,type,
    p_9: $o ).

tff(p_5,type,
    p_5: $o ).

tff(p_7,type,
    p_7: $o ).

tff(p_6,type,
    p_6: $o ).

tff(p_8,type,
    p_8: $o ).

tff(p_10,type,
    p_10: $o ).

tff(p_3,type,
    p_3: $o ).

tff(p_1,type,
    p_1: $o ).

tff(p_0,type,
    p_0: $o ).

tff(p_4,type,
    p_4: $o ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    p_1,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_57,axiom,
    p_2,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_58,axiom,
    p_3,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    p_4,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_60,axiom,
    p_5,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    p_6,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_62,axiom,
    p_7,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    p_8,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_64,axiom,
    p_9,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_65,axiom,
    p_10,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_55,axiom,
    ( p_0
    | ~ p_1
    | ~ p_2
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_7
    | ~ p_8
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_10 ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_24,axiom,
    ~ p_0,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    p_1,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    p_2,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    p_3,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_58]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    p_4,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    p_5,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    p_6,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    p_7,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_62]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    p_8,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    p_9,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_64]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    p_10,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ( ~ p_10
    | ~ p_9
    | ~ p_8
    | ~ p_7
    | ~ p_6
    | ~ p_5
    | ~ p_4
    | ~ p_3
    | ~ p_2
    | ~ p_1
    | p_0 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    p_0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_8,c_10,c_12,c_14,c_16,c_18,c_20,c_22,c_24,c_4]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ p_0,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_24]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_26,c_2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN085-1.010 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:50:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.08/1.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.08/1.44  
% 2.08/1.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.08/1.48  
% 2.08/1.48  Inference rules
% 2.08/1.48  ----------------------
% 2.08/1.48  #Ref     : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #Sup     : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #Fact    : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #Define  : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #Split   : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #Chain   : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #Close   : 0
% 2.08/1.48  
% 2.08/1.48  Ordering : KBO
% 2.08/1.48  
% 2.08/1.48  Simplification rules
% 2.08/1.48  ----------------------
% 2.08/1.48  #Subsume      : 11
% 2.08/1.48  #Demod        : 11
% 2.08/1.48  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.08/1.48  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.08/1.48  
% 2.08/1.48  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.08/1.48  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.08/1.48  
% 2.08/1.48  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.08/1.48  ----------------------
% 2.08/1.49  Preprocessing        : 0.36
% 2.08/1.49  Parsing              : 0.19
% 2.08/1.49  CNF conversion       : 0.01
% 2.08/1.49  Main loop            : 0.07
% 2.08/1.49  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Reduction            : 0.03
% 2.08/1.49  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.08/1.49  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.08/1.49  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.08/1.49  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Total                : 0.49
% 2.08/1.49  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.08/1.49  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------