TSTP Solution File: SYN083-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN083-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 4 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
f(a,f(b,f(c,d))) != f(f(f(a,b),c),d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8LWaaHVUn8/E---3.1_29338.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(f_is_associative,axiom,
f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8LWaaHVUn8/E---3.1_29338.p',f_is_associative) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
f(a,f(b,f(c,d))) != f(f(f(a,b),c),d),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),X3),
f_is_associative ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]),c_0_3]),c_0_3])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN083-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.15/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:05:46 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8LWaaHVUn8/E---3.1_29338.p
% 0.22/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # new_bool_1 with pid 29420 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.50 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 93s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 29426 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.50 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 93s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.22/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.22/0.50 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 73
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1424 pages
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.22/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------