TSTP Solution File: SYN083+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:22:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 01:42:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.13/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.13/0.34 [0.000037s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 Start search
% 0.13/0.34 nb_step : 1 - limit : 2
% 0.13/0.34 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 [0] ALPHA_AND : (! [X4_4, Y5_5, Z6_6] : (=(f(X4_4, f(Y5_5, Z6_6)), f(f(X4_4, Y5_5), Z6_6))) & ~! [X7_7, Y8_8, Z9_9, W10_10] : (=(f(X7_7, f(Y8_8, f(Z9_9, W10_10))), f(f(f(X7_7, Y8_8), Z9_9), W10_10))))
% 0.19/0.49 -> [1] ! [X4_4, Y5_5, Z6_6] : (=(f(X4_4, f(Y5_5, Z6_6)), f(f(X4_4, Y5_5), Z6_6))), ~! [X7_7, Y8_8, Z9_9, W10_10] : (=(f(X7_7, f(Y8_8, f(Z9_9, W10_10))), f(f(f(X7_7, Y8_8), Z9_9), W10_10)))
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 [1] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X7_7, Y8_8, Z9_9, W10_10] : (=(f(X7_7, f(Y8_8, f(Z9_9, W10_10))), f(f(f(X7_7, Y8_8), Z9_9), W10_10)))
% 0.19/0.49 -> [2] ~=(f(skolem_X77, f(skolem_Y88, f(skolem_Z99, skolem_W1010))), f(f(f(skolem_X77, skolem_Y88), skolem_Z99), skolem_W1010))
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 [2] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X4_4, Y5_5, Z6_6] : (=(f(X4_4, f(Y5_5, Z6_6)), f(f(X4_4, Y5_5), Z6_6)))
% 0.19/0.49 -> [3] =(f(X4_0_0, f(Y5_0_0, Z6_0_0)), f(f(X4_0_0, Y5_0_0), Z6_0_0))
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 [3] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X4_4, Y5_5, Z6_6] : (=(f(X4_4, f(Y5_5, Z6_6)), f(f(X4_4, Y5_5), Z6_6)))
% 0.19/0.49 -> [4] ! [X4_4, Y5_5, Z6_6] : (=(f(X4_4, f(Y5_5, Z6_6)), f(f(X4_4, Y5_5), Z6_6)))
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 [4] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X4_4, Y5_5, Z6_6] : (=(f(X4_4, f(Y5_5, Z6_6)), f(f(X4_4, Y5_5), Z6_6)))
% 0.19/0.49 -> [5] =(f(X4_1_0, f(Y5_1_0, Z6_1_0)), f(f(X4_1_0, Y5_1_0), Z6_1_0))
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 [5] CLOSURE : =
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 [0.148205s][1][Res] 525 goroutines created
% 0.19/0.49 ==== Result ====
% 0.19/0.49 [0.148294s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------