TSTP Solution File: SYN082+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SYN082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:41:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN082+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 19:18:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.39 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.20/0.39 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.39 1. (big_f T_0 T_1) (-. (big_f T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.39 2. (-. (big_f T_0 (f T_0))) (big_f T_0 (f T_0)) ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.39 3. ((big_f T_0 T_1) => (big_f T_0 (f T_0))) (-. (big_f T_0 (f T_0))) (big_f T_0 T_1) ### Imply 1 2
% 0.20/0.39 4. (All Z, ((big_f Z T_1) => (big_f Z (f T_0)))) (big_f T_0 T_1) (-. (big_f T_0 (f T_0))) ### All 3
% 0.20/0.39 5. ((All Z, ((big_f Z T_1) => (big_f Z (f T_0)))) /\ (big_f T_0 T_1)) (-. (big_f T_0 (f T_0))) ### And 4
% 0.20/0.39 6. (Ex Y, ((All Z, ((big_f Z Y) => (big_f Z (f T_0)))) /\ (big_f T_0 Y))) (-. (big_f T_0 (f T_0))) ### Exists 5
% 0.20/0.39 7. (-. (big_f T_2 (f T_0))) (big_f T_2 (f T_0)) ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.39 8. (-. ((big_f T_2 (f T_0)) => (big_f T_2 (f T_0)))) ### NotImply 7
% 0.20/0.39 9. (-. (All Z, ((big_f Z (f T_0)) => (big_f Z (f T_0))))) ### NotAllEx 8
% 0.20/0.39 10. (big_f T_0 (f T_0)) (-. (big_f T_0 (f T_0))) ### Axiom
% 0.20/0.39 11. (-. ((All Z, ((big_f Z (f T_0)) => (big_f Z (f T_0)))) /\ (big_f T_0 (f T_0)))) (big_f T_0 (f T_0)) ### NotAnd 9 10
% 0.20/0.39 12. (-. (Ex Y, ((All Z, ((big_f Z Y) => (big_f Z (f T_0)))) /\ (big_f T_0 Y)))) (big_f T_0 (f T_0)) ### NotExists 11
% 0.20/0.39 13. (-. ((big_f T_0 (f T_0)) <=> (Ex Y, ((All Z, ((big_f Z Y) => (big_f Z (f T_0)))) /\ (big_f T_0 Y))))) ### NotEquiv 6 12
% 0.20/0.39 14. (-. (All X, ((big_f X (f X)) <=> (Ex Y, ((All Z, ((big_f Z Y) => (big_f Z (f X)))) /\ (big_f X Y)))))) ### NotAllEx 13
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.39 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------