TSTP Solution File: SYN082+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SYN082+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 13:13:19 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   81 (  30   ~;  30   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  14   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( big_f(X1,f(X1))
    <=> ? [X2] :
          ( ! [X3] :
              ( big_f(X3,X2)
             => big_f(X3,f(X1)) )
          & big_f(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpCV5HC2/sel_SYN082+1.p_1',pel60) ).

fof(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( big_f(X1,f(X1))
      <=> ? [X2] :
            ( ! [X3] :
                ( big_f(X3,X2)
               => big_f(X3,f(X1)) )
            & big_f(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

fof(3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X1,f(X1))
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( big_f(X3,X2)
                & ~ big_f(X3,f(X1)) )
            | ~ big_f(X1,X2) ) )
      & ( big_f(X1,f(X1))
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ! [X3] :
                ( ~ big_f(X3,X2)
                | big_f(X3,f(X1)) )
            & big_f(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

fof(4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X4,f(X4))
        | ! [X5] :
            ( ? [X6] :
                ( big_f(X6,X5)
                & ~ big_f(X6,f(X4)) )
            | ~ big_f(X4,X5) ) )
      & ( big_f(X4,f(X4))
        | ? [X7] :
            ( ! [X8] :
                ( ~ big_f(X8,X7)
                | big_f(X8,f(X4)) )
            & big_f(X4,X7) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0))
      | ! [X5] :
          ( ( big_f(esk2_1(X5),X5)
            & ~ big_f(esk2_1(X5),f(esk1_0)) )
          | ~ big_f(esk1_0,X5) ) )
    & ( big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0))
      | ( ! [X8] :
            ( ~ big_f(X8,esk3_0)
            | big_f(X8,f(esk1_0)) )
        & big_f(esk1_0,esk3_0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

fof(6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5,X8] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(X8,esk3_0)
            | big_f(X8,f(esk1_0)) )
          & big_f(esk1_0,esk3_0) )
        | big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)) )
      & ( ( big_f(esk2_1(X5),X5)
          & ~ big_f(esk2_1(X5),f(esk1_0)) )
        | ~ big_f(esk1_0,X5)
        | ~ big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

fof(7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5,X8] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X8,esk3_0)
        | big_f(X8,f(esk1_0))
        | big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)) )
      & ( big_f(esk1_0,esk3_0)
        | big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)) )
      & ( big_f(esk2_1(X5),X5)
        | ~ big_f(esk1_0,X5)
        | ~ big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(esk2_1(X5),f(esk1_0))
        | ~ big_f(esk1_0,X5)
        | ~ big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0))
    | ~ big_f(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ big_f(esk2_1(X1),f(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk2_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0))
    | ~ big_f(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(10,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0))
    | big_f(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(11,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0))
    | big_f(X1,f(esk1_0))
    | ~ big_f(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[8,9,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[10,13,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(15,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(esk1_0,f(esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[11,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[15,13,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    16,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN082+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpCV5HC2/sel_SYN082+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SYN082+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN082+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN082+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------