TSTP Solution File: SYN081+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SYN081+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:44:06 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13  % Problem    : SYN081+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.09/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 17:54:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.63  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % File     : SYN081+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.20/0.63  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.63  % Problem  : Pelletier Problem 59
% 0.20/0.63  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.20/0.63  % English  :
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Refs     : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.20/0.63  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.63  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.20/0.63  % Names    : Pelletier 59 [Pel86]
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.63  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.63  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   0 equ)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of connectives :    4 (   2   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
% 0.20/0.63  %                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of variables   :    2 (   1   !;   1   ?)
% 0.20/0.63  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Comments :
% 0.20/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  fof(pel59_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63      ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63        ( big_f(X)
% 0.20/0.63      <=> ~ big_f(f(X)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  fof(pel59,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63      ? [X] :
% 0.20/0.63        ( big_f(X)
% 0.20/0.63        & ~ big_f(f(X)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.63  %ClaNum:3(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.63  %VarNum:6(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.20/0.63  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.63  %SharedTerms:0
% 0.20/0.63  %goalClause: 2
% 0.20/0.63  [1]P1(x11)+P1(f1(x11))
% 0.20/0.63  [2]~P1(x21)+P1(f1(x21))
% 0.20/0.63  [3]~P1(x31)+~P1(f1(x31))
% 0.20/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  cnf(4,plain,
% 0.20/0.64     (P1(f1(x41))),
% 0.20/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2])).
% 0.20/0.64  cnf(5,plain,
% 0.20/0.64     (~P1(x51)),
% 0.20/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,3])).
% 0.20/0.64  cnf(7,plain,
% 0.20/0.64     ($false),
% 0.20/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5]),
% 0.20/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.64  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------