TSTP Solution File: SYN079-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN079-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_3,axiom,
( big_f(X1,X3)
| ~ big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_f(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CUIHfzi8Wd/E---3.1_28910.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_2,axiom,
big_f(f(b,c),f(a,c)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CUIHfzi8Wd/E---3.1_28910.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ big_f(f(a,b),f(a,c)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CUIHfzi8Wd/E---3.1_28910.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(clause_1,axiom,
big_f(f(a,b),f(b,c)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CUIHfzi8Wd/E---3.1_28910.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( big_f(X1,X3)
| ~ big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_f(X2,X3) ),
clause_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
big_f(f(b,c),f(a,c)),
clause_2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ big_f(f(a,b),f(a,c)),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( big_f(X1,f(a,c))
| ~ big_f(X1,f(b,c)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
big_f(f(a,b),f(b,c)),
clause_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SYN079-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.31 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:44:33 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CUIHfzi8Wd/E---3.1_28910.p
% 0.16/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 28990 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28995 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.16/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.16/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.16/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 145
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.16/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------