TSTP Solution File: SYN078+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:33:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  129 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  53   ~;  53   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (  23   !;  13   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f26,f31,f36,f41,f42,f43,f47,f49,f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_4
    | spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f50,f45,f28,f19,f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> big_p(sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> big_p(sK1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> sK1 = f(sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ( spl3_6
  <=> ! [X5] :
        ( big_p(f(X5))
        | ~ big_p(X5) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_6])]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | ~ big_p(sK2)
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f46,f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( sK1 = f(sK2)
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ( ! [X5] :
        ( big_p(f(X5))
        | ~ big_p(X5) )
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_5
    | spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f48,f45,f23,f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( spl3_5
  <=> big_p(sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_5])]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> big_p(f(sK0)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK0)
    | spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f46,f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK0))
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ( spl3_6
    | spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f17,f45,f45]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X3,X5] :
      ( big_p(f(X3))
      | ~ big_p(X3)
      | big_p(f(X5))
      | ~ big_p(X5) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X5] :
      ( big_p(f(X3))
      | ~ big_p(X3)
      | big_p(X4)
      | f(X5) != X4
      | ~ big_p(X5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ big_p(f(sK0))
        & big_p(sK0) )
      | ( ~ big_p(sK1)
        & sK1 = f(sK2)
        & big_p(sK2) ) )
    & ( ! [X3] :
          ( big_p(f(X3))
          | ~ big_p(X3) )
      | ! [X4] :
          ( big_p(X4)
          | ! [X5] :
              ( f(X5) != X4
              | ~ big_p(X5) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f5,f8,f7,f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ~ big_p(f(X0))
        & big_p(X0) )
   => ( ~ big_p(f(sK0))
      & big_p(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ~ big_p(X1)
        & ? [X2] :
            ( f(X2) = X1
            & big_p(X2) ) )
   => ( ~ big_p(sK1)
      & ? [X2] :
          ( f(X2) = sK1
          & big_p(X2) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( f(X2) = sK1
        & big_p(X2) )
   => ( sK1 = f(sK2)
      & big_p(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ? [X0] :
          ( ~ big_p(f(X0))
          & big_p(X0) )
      | ? [X1] :
          ( ~ big_p(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( f(X2) = X1
              & big_p(X2) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X3] :
          ( big_p(f(X3))
          | ~ big_p(X3) )
      | ! [X4] :
          ( big_p(X4)
          | ! [X5] :
              ( f(X5) != X4
              | ~ big_p(X5) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ( ? [X2] :
          ( ~ big_p(f(X2))
          & big_p(X2) )
      | ? [X0] :
          ( ~ big_p(X0)
          & ? [X1] :
              ( f(X1) = X0
              & big_p(X1) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( big_p(f(X2))
          | ~ big_p(X2) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( big_p(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( f(X1) != X0
              | ~ big_p(X1) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( big_p(X0)
        | ! [X1] :
            ( f(X1) != X0
            | ~ big_p(X1) ) )
  <~> ! [X2] :
        ( big_p(f(X2))
        | ~ big_p(X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0] :
          ( ? [X1] :
              ( f(X1) = X0
              & big_p(X1) )
         => big_p(X0) )
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( big_p(X2)
         => big_p(f(X2)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( f(X1) = X0
            & big_p(X1) )
       => big_p(X0) )
  <=> ! [X2] :
        ( big_p(X2)
       => big_p(f(X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uQzMWOcenY/Vampire---4.8_32492',pel56) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ( spl3_4
    | spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f38,f33]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( big_p(sK0)
    | big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f38,f28]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( big_p(sK0)
    | sK1 = f(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f38,f19]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( big_p(sK0)
    | ~ big_p(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( spl3_4
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f23,f33]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK0))
    | big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f15,f23,f28]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK0))
    | sK1 = f(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f16,f23,f19]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(f(sK0))
    | ~ big_p(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 17:40:25 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uQzMWOcenY/Vampire---4.8_32492
% 0.55/0.75  % (32705)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (32711)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (32705)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (32711)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)Memory used [KB]: 976
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (32711)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (32706)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32704)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32707)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32708)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32709)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32710)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)Memory used [KB]: 983
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (32705)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (32680)Success in time 0.393 s
% 0.62/0.76  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------