TSTP Solution File: SYN078+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:09:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem  : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 12:23:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.29  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.29  The process was started by sandbox2 on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.29  Mon Jul 11 12:23:54 2022
% 0.13/0.29  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 31400.
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.29  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.29  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.29  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.29  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.29  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.29     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.29    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.29  
% 0.13/0.29  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.32  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.32  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.32  number of clauses in intial UL: 8
% 0.13/0.32  number of clauses initially in problem: 11
% 0.13/0.32  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 72
% 0.13/0.32  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.32  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.32  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.13/0.32     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.13/0.32     distinct function count: 1
% 0.13/0.32     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.32  
% 0.13/0.32  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  Model 3 [ 4 0 280 ] (0.00 seconds, 791 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  Model 4 [ 4 1 338 ] (0.00 seconds, 697 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.04 sec ----> 30 [hyper,28,6,21] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  Length of proof is 11.  Level of proof is 8.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  1 [] {+} -big_p(A)|B!=f(A)|big_p(B)| -big_p(C)|big_p(f(C)).
% 0.13/0.35  2 [] {+} big_p($c1)| -big_p(f($c3)).
% 0.13/0.35  3 [] {-} $c2=f($c1)| -big_p(f($c3)).
% 0.13/0.35  4 [copy,3,flip.1] {+} f($c1)=$c2| -big_p(f($c3)).
% 0.13/0.35  5 [] {+} -big_p($c2)|big_p($c3).
% 0.13/0.35  6 [] {+} -big_p($c2)| -big_p(f($c3)).
% 0.13/0.35  7 [factor,1.1.4] {+} -big_p(A)|B!=f(A)|big_p(B)|big_p(f(A)).
% 0.13/0.35  9 [factor,7.3.4] {+} -big_p(A)|f(A)!=f(A)|big_p(f(A)).
% 0.13/0.35  10 [] {+} big_p($c1)|big_p($c3).
% 0.13/0.35  11 [] {-} $c2=f($c1)|big_p($c3).
% 0.13/0.35  12 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} f($c1)=$c2|big_p($c3).
% 0.13/0.35  13 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.13/0.35  17 [para_from,12.1.1,9.3.1,unit_del,13] {-} -big_p($c1)|big_p($c2)|big_p($c3).
% 0.13/0.35  19 [hyper,17,10,factor_simp] {-} big_p($c2)|big_p($c3).
% 0.13/0.35  20 [hyper,19,5,factor_simp] {-} big_p($c3).
% 0.13/0.35  21 [hyper,13,9,20] {-} big_p(f($c3)).
% 0.13/0.35  24,23 [hyper,21,4] {+} f($c1)=$c2.
% 0.13/0.35  25 [hyper,21,2] {+} big_p($c1).
% 0.13/0.35  28 [para_from,23.1.1,9.3.1,demod,24,24,unit_del,25,13] {-} big_p($c2).
% 0.13/0.35  30 [hyper,28,6,21] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.35  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ============ end of search ============
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  true clauses given           1      (10.0%)
% 0.13/0.35  false clauses given          9
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.13/0.35     4  1         0
% 0.13/0.35  tot:  1         0      (0.0% true)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  Model 4 [ 4 0 338 ] (0.00 seconds, 697 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  Process 31400 finished Mon Jul 11 12:23:54 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------