TSTP Solution File: SYN078+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:07:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 12:10:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.13/0.36 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 0.13/0.36 #
% 0.13/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.36 # Number of axioms: 7 Number of unprocessed: 7
% 0.13/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.36 # 7 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 7 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are 7 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.36 # Found 0 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.36 # 7 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.36 # 7 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.36 # 0 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 7
% 0.13/0.36 # Returning from population with 19 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.36 # We now have 19 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.13/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.13/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.13/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (f(esk2_0)=esk1_0|big_p(esk3_0))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (big_p(esk3_0)|~big_p(esk1_0))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~big_p(f(esk3_0))|~big_p(esk1_0))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (f(esk2_0)=esk1_0|~big_p(f(esk3_0)))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (big_p(esk2_0)|~big_p(f(esk3_0)))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (big_p(esk3_0)|big_p(esk2_0))).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (big_p(f(X1))|big_p(f(X2))|~big_p(X2)|~big_p(X1))).
% 0.13/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.36 # Found 7 steps
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (big_p(esk3_0)|big_p(esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (big_p(esk3_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (~big_p(esk3_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (big_p(f(esk3_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (big_p(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_14, ...])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (big_p(f(esk3_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_74, ...])).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (big_p(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])).
% 0.13/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.36 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (f(esk2_0)=esk1_0|big_p(esk3_0))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (big_p(esk3_0)|~big_p(esk1_0))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~big_p(f(esk3_0))|~big_p(esk1_0))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (f(esk2_0)=esk1_0|~big_p(f(esk3_0)))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (big_p(esk2_0)|~big_p(f(esk3_0)))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (big_p(esk3_0)|big_p(esk2_0))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (big_p(f(X1))|big_p(f(X2))|~big_p(X2)|~big_p(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.37 # Found 7 steps
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~big_p(f(esk3_0))|~big_p(esk1_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~big_p(f(esk3_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (big_p(f(esk3_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (~big_p(esk3_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~big_p(esk1_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_20, ...])).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (~big_p(esk3_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_76, ...])).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (big_p(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_78, ...])).
% 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.37 # Child (12452) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 4 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 4 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------