TSTP Solution File: SYN078+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:49:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.34s 2.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 6 unt; 7 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 7 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(X1)
| big_p(f(X2))
| X1 != f(X3)
| ~ big_p(X2)
| ~ big_p(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cwt2wnrx/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0) = esk1_0
| ~ big_p(f(esk3_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cwt2wnrx/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0) = esk1_0
| big_p(esk3_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cwt2wnrx/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(esk2_0)
| ~ big_p(f(esk3_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cwt2wnrx/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(esk2_0)
| big_p(esk3_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cwt2wnrx/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(esk1_0)
| ~ big_p(f(esk3_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cwt2wnrx/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(esk3_0)
| ~ big_p(esk1_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cwt2wnrx/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(X1)
| big_p(f(X2))
| X1 != f(X3)
| ~ big_p(X2)
| ~ big_p(X3) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(f(X1))
| big_p(f(X2))
| ~ big_p(X1)
| ~ big_p(X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0) = esk1_0
| ~ big_p(f(esk3_0)) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(f(X1))
| ~ big_p(X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0) = esk1_0
| big_p(esk3_0) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(esk2_0)
| ~ big_p(f(esk3_0)) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(esk2_0)
| big_p(esk3_0) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
f(esk2_0) = esk1_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
big_p(esk2_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_p(esk1_0)
| ~ big_p(f(esk3_0)) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
big_p(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( big_p(esk3_0)
| ~ big_p(esk1_0) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(f(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
big_p(esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_18]),c_0_28])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 12:17:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.34/2.31 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.34/2.31 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.34/2.31 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.34/2.31 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0026_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 7.34/2.31 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.34/2.31 #
% 7.34/2.31 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 7.34/2.31
% 7.34/2.31 # Proof found!
% 7.34/2.31 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.34/2.31 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.34/2.31 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.34/2.31
% 7.34/2.31 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.34/2.31 # User time : 0.021 s
% 7.34/2.31 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.34/2.31 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 7.34/2.31 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.34/2.31
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------