TSTP Solution File: SYN074-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN074-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:07:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN074-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 05:50:22 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.19/0.36 # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 0.19/0.36 #
% 0.19/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.36 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.19/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.36 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 8 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.36 # There are 8 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.36 # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.36 # 8 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.36 # 10 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.36 # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (big_f(a,b))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X1=b|~big_f(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=a|~big_f(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)!=X2|f(X1)!=X1|~big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (f(X1)=X1|big_f(f(X1),g(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (f(X1)=X1|X2=g(X1)|~big_f(f(X1),X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|f(X1)!=X1)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (X1=g(X2)|h(X2,X3)!=X3|~big_f(f(X2),h(X2,X3))|~big_f(f(X2),X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (big_f(f(X1),g(X1))|h(X1,X2)!=X2|~big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|X3=g(X1)|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|~big_f(f(X1),X3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|big_f(f(X1),g(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_144, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 8 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_144, plain, (a=a), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_182, plain, (a=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_148])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_221, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_144])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_222, plain, (~big_f(a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_219, plain, (big_f(a,b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_148])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_267, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_144])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_266, plain, (big_f(a,a)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_266, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_268, plain, (b!=a), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_268, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (big_f(a,b))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X1=b|~big_f(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=a|~big_f(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)!=X2|f(X1)!=X1|~big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (f(X1)=X1|big_f(f(X1),g(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (f(X1)=X1|X2=g(X1)|~big_f(f(X1),X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|f(X1)!=X1)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (X1=g(X2)|h(X2,X3)!=X3|~big_f(f(X2),h(X2,X3))|~big_f(f(X2),X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (big_f(f(X1),g(X1))|h(X1,X2)!=X2|~big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|X3=g(X1)|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|~big_f(f(X1),X3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|big_f(f(X1),g(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 10 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (a=a), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_120, plain, (a=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_86])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_159, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_82])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_160, plain, (~big_f(a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_157, plain, (big_f(a,b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_86])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_205, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_82])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_204, plain, (big_f(a,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_206, plain, (b!=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_208, plain, (a=b), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_208, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_211, plain, (~big_f(b,X5)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_211, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (big_f(a,b))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X1=b|~big_f(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=a|~big_f(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)!=X2|f(X1)!=X1|~big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (f(X1)=X1|big_f(f(X1),g(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (f(X1)=X1|X2=g(X1)|~big_f(f(X1),X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|f(X1)!=X1)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (X1=g(X2)|h(X2,X3)!=X3|~big_f(f(X2),h(X2,X3))|~big_f(f(X2),X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (big_f(f(X1),g(X1))|h(X1,X2)!=X2|~big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|X3=g(X1)|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|~big_f(f(X1),X3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (h(X1,X2)=X2|big_f(f(X1),h(X1,X2))|big_f(f(X1),g(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_187, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 8 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_187, plain, (a=a), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_225, plain, (a=a), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_191])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_264, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_187])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_265, plain, (~big_f(a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_262, plain, (big_f(a,b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_191])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_310, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_187])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_309, plain, (big_f(a,a)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_309, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_311, plain, (b!=a), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_311, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # Child (21507) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------