TSTP Solution File: SYN074-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN074-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.51s 1.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   5 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  51 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   83 (  43   ~;  40   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   4   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (;  41   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ big_f > h > #nlpp > g > f > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(h,type,
    h: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(f,type,
    f: $i > $i ).

tff(g,type,
    g: $i > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(big_f,type,
    big_f: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_82,axiom,
    ! [Y,X] :
      ( ( Y != g(X) )
      | big_f(f(X),Y)
      | ( f(X) = X ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ big_f(X,Y)
      | ( X = a ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_100,axiom,
    ! [X,Z] :
      ( ( f(X) != X )
      | big_f(f(X),h(X,Z))
      | ( h(X,Z) = Z ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ big_f(X,Y)
      | ( Y = b ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_39,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( X != a )
      | ( Y != b )
      | big_f(X,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_109,axiom,
    ! [X,Z] :
      ( ( f(X) != X )
      | ( h(X,Z) != Z )
      | ~ big_f(f(X),h(X,Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    ! [X_31] :
      ( ( f(X_31) = X_31 )
      | big_f(f(X_31),g(X_31)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1,Y_2] :
      ( ( a = X_1 )
      | ~ big_f(X_1,Y_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [X_31] :
      ( ( f(X_31) = a )
      | ( f(X_31) = X_31 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_35,c_2]) ).

tff(c_47,plain,
    ! [X_31] :
      ( ( f(X_31) = X_31 )
      | ( a != X_31 ) ),
    inference(factorization,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_42]) ).

tff(c_178,plain,
    ! [X_38,Z_39] :
      ( ( h(X_38,Z_39) = Z_39 )
      | big_f(f(X_38),h(X_38,Z_39))
      | ( f(X_38) != X_38 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_100]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [Y_4,X_3] :
      ( ( b = Y_4 )
      | ~ big_f(X_3,Y_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_202,plain,
    ! [X_38,Z_39] :
      ( ( h(X_38,Z_39) = b )
      | ( h(X_38,Z_39) = Z_39 )
      | ( f(X_38) != X_38 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_178,c_4]) ).

tff(c_262,plain,
    ! [X_38,Z_39] :
      ( ( f(X_38) != X_38 )
      | ( h(X_38,Z_39) = Z_39 )
      | ( b != Z_39 ) ),
    inference(factorization,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_202]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    big_f(a,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_267,plain,
    ! [X_38,Z_39] :
      ( ( f(X_38) != X_38 )
      | ( h(X_38,Z_39) = b )
      | ( b != Z_39 ) ),
    inference(factorization,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_202]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [X_31] :
      ( ( f(X_31) = a )
      | ( a != X_31 ) ),
    inference(factorization,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_42]) ).

tff(c_318,plain,
    ! [X_46,Z_47] :
      ( ~ big_f(f(X_46),h(X_46,Z_47))
      | ( h(X_46,Z_47) != Z_47 )
      | ( f(X_46) != X_46 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_109]) ).

tff(c_568,plain,
    ! [X_62,Z_63] :
      ( ~ big_f(a,h(X_62,Z_63))
      | ( h(X_62,Z_63) != Z_63 )
      | ( f(X_62) != X_62 )
      | ( a != X_62 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_52,c_318]) ).

tff(c_577,plain,
    ! [X_38,Z_39] :
      ( ~ big_f(a,b)
      | ( h(X_38,Z_39) != Z_39 )
      | ( f(X_38) != X_38 )
      | ( a != X_38 )
      | ( f(X_38) != X_38 )
      | ( b != Z_39 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_267,c_568]) ).

tff(c_641,plain,
    ! [X_66,Z_67] :
      ( ( h(X_66,Z_67) != Z_67 )
      | ( a != X_66 )
      | ( f(X_66) != X_66 )
      | ( b != Z_67 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_577]) ).

tff(c_657,plain,
    ! [X_38,Z_39] :
      ( ( a != X_38 )
      | ( f(X_38) != X_38 )
      | ( b != Z_39 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_262,c_641]) ).

tff(c_660,plain,
    ! [Z_39] : ( b != Z_39 ),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_657]) ).

tff(c_668,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reflexivity,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_660]) ).

tff(c_696,plain,
    ! [X_71] :
      ( ( a != X_71 )
      | ( f(X_71) != X_71 ) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_657]) ).

tff(c_709,plain,
    ! [X_31] : ( a != X_31 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_47,c_696]) ).

tff(c_718,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reflexivity,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_709]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN074-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:31:34 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.51/1.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/1.87  
% 3.51/1.87  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.65/1.90  
% 3.65/1.90  Inference rules
% 3.65/1.90  ----------------------
% 3.65/1.90  #Ref     : 2
% 3.65/1.90  #Sup     : 184
% 3.65/1.90  #Fact    : 4
% 3.65/1.90  #Define  : 0
% 3.65/1.90  #Split   : 1
% 3.65/1.90  #Chain   : 0
% 3.65/1.90  #Close   : 0
% 3.65/1.90  
% 3.65/1.90  Ordering : KBO
% 3.65/1.90  
% 3.65/1.90  Simplification rules
% 3.65/1.90  ----------------------
% 3.65/1.90  #Subsume      : 84
% 3.65/1.90  #Demod        : 8
% 3.65/1.90  #Tautology    : 59
% 3.65/1.90  #SimpNegUnit  : 8
% 3.65/1.90  #BackRed      : 6
% 3.65/1.90  
% 3.65/1.90  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.65/1.90  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.65/1.90  
% 3.65/1.90  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.65/1.90  ----------------------
% 3.65/1.90  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 3.65/1.90  Parsing              : 0.23
% 3.65/1.90  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.65/1.90  Main loop            : 0.40
% 3.65/1.90  Inferencing          : 0.16
% 3.65/1.90  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.65/1.90  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.65/1.90  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.65/1.90  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 3.65/1.90  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.65/1.90  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.65/1.91  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.65/1.91  Total                : 0.88
% 3.65/1.91  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.65/1.91  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.65/1.91  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.65/1.91  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------