TSTP Solution File: SYN074+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYN074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 10:06:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  38 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  21   ~;  27   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   2 sgn  12   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel51,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X3] :
      ( ? [X2] :
        ! [X4] :
          ( big_f(X3,X4)
        <=> X4 = X2 )
    <=> X3 = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hzcFBslWdH/E---3.1_4127.p',pel51) ).

fof(pel51_1,axiom,
    ? [X1,X2] :
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( big_f(X3,X4)
    <=> ( X3 = X1
        & X4 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hzcFBslWdH/E---3.1_4127.p',pel51_1) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( ? [X2] :
          ! [X4] :
            ( big_f(X3,X4)
          <=> X4 = X2 )
      <=> X3 = X1 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel51]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5,X7,X10,X11] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(esk1_1(X5),esk2_2(X5,X7))
        | esk2_2(X5,X7) != X7
        | esk1_1(X5) != X5 )
      & ( big_f(esk1_1(X5),esk2_2(X5,X7))
        | esk2_2(X5,X7) = X7
        | esk1_1(X5) != X5 )
      & ( ~ big_f(esk1_1(X5),X10)
        | X10 = esk3_1(X5)
        | esk1_1(X5) = X5 )
      & ( X11 != esk3_1(X5)
        | big_f(esk1_1(X5),X11)
        | esk1_1(X5) = X5 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X14,X15] :
      ( ( X14 = esk4_0
        | ~ big_f(X14,X15) )
      & ( X15 = esk5_0
        | ~ big_f(X14,X15) )
      & ( X14 != esk4_0
        | X15 != esk5_0
        | big_f(X14,X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel51_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk1_1(X2),X1)
    | esk1_1(X2) = X2
    | X1 != esk3_1(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X1 = esk4_0
    | ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = X1
    | big_f(esk1_1(X1),esk3_1(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = esk5_0
    | ~ big_f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk1_1(X1),esk2_2(X1,X2))
    | esk2_2(X1,X2) = X2
    | esk1_1(X1) != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = esk4_0
    | esk1_1(X1) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_2(X1,X2) = esk5_0
    | esk2_2(X1,X2) = X2
    | esk1_1(X1) != X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_1(esk4_0) = esk4_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_2(esk4_0,X1) = esk5_0
    | esk2_2(esk4_0,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | X1 != esk4_0
    | X2 != esk5_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(esk1_1(X1),esk2_2(X1,X2))
    | esk2_2(X1,X2) != X2
    | esk1_1(X1) != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_2(esk4_0,esk5_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    big_f(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SYN074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 10:58:33 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hzcFBslWdH/E---3.1_4127.p
% 0.21/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # new_bool_3 with pid 4206 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4210 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.21/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 51
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.21/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 14
% 0.21/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 35
% 0.21/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 12
% 0.21/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 93
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 56
% 0.21/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.21/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 78
% 0.21/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.21/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 12
% 0.21/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 41
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 39
% 0.21/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.21/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 60
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.21/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 60
% 0.21/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 52
% 0.21/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 19
% 0.21/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1420
% 0.21/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 209
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.21/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------