TSTP Solution File: SYN067-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN067-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:09:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.03s 300.22s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN067-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:27:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.38 Mon Jul 11 18:27:49 2022
% 0.19/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 15853.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.19/0.38 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.19/0.38 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 76 during input processing: 0 [] {-} big_p(a)| -big_p(c4)|big_p(c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 76 during input processing: 0 [] {-} big_p(a)| -big_p(c4)|big_r(c4,c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 76 during input processing: 0 [] {-} big_p(a)| -big_p(c4)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} big_p(a)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [] {-} big_p(a)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A)|big_p(c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [] {-} big_p(a)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A)|big_r(c4,c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} big_p(a)| -big_p(C)| -big_r(c4,D)| -big_r(D,C).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_p(c1)|big_p(a)|big_p(c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_p(c1)|big_p(a)|big_r(c4,c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_p(c1)|big_p(a)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_p(c1)| -big_p(c4)|big_p(a).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_p(c1)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A)|big_p(a).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_r(c2,c1)|big_p(a)|big_p(c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_r(c2,c1)|big_p(a)|big_r(c4,c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_r(c2,c1)|big_p(a)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_r(c2,c1)| -big_p(c4)|big_p(a).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(c2)|big_r(c2,c1)| -big_p(A)| -big_r(c4,B)| -big_r(B,A)|big_p(a).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(A)| -big_r(c2,B)| -big_r(B,A)|big_p(a)|big_p(c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(A)| -big_r(c2,B)| -big_r(B,A)|big_p(a)|big_r(c4,c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(A)| -big_r(c2,B)| -big_r(B,A)|big_p(a)| -big_p(C)| -big_r(c4,D)| -big_r(D,C).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(A)| -big_r(c2,B)| -big_r(B,A)| -big_p(c4)|big_p(a).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -big_p(A)| -big_r(c2,B)| -big_r(B,A)| -big_p(C)| -big_r(c4,D)| -big_r(D,C)|big_p(a).
% 0.19/0.38 85 back subsumes 83.
% 0.19/0.38 85 back subsumes 82.
% 0.19/0.38 85 back subsumes 81.
% 0.19/0.38 94 back subsumes 92.
% 0.19/0.38 94 back subsumes 91.
% 0.19/0.38 94 back subsumes 90.
% 0.19/0.38 103 back subsumes 101.
% 0.19/0.38 103 back subsumes 100.
% 0.19/0.38 103 back subsumes 99.
% 0.19/0.38 192 back subsumes 191.
% 0.19/0.38 192 back subsumes 190.
% 0.19/0.38 192 back subsumes 188.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 230 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} big_p(a)|big_p(c3).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 230 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} big_p(a)|big_r(c4,c3).
% 0.19/0.38 230 back subsumes 183.
% 0.19/0.38 230 back subsumes 96.
% 0.19/0.38 230 back subsumes 87.
% 0.19/0.38 230 back subsumes 78.
% 0.19/0.38 230 back subsumes 76.
% 0.19/0.38 230 back subsumes 74.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.68/0.89 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.68/0.89 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.68/0.89 number of clauses in intial UL: 166
% 0.68/0.89 number of clauses initially in problem: 167
% 0.68/0.89 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 0.68/0.89 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.68/0.89 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.68/0.89 absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.68/0.89 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.68/0.89 distinct function count: 6
% 0.68/0.89 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89
% 0.68/0.89 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.22 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------