TSTP Solution File: SYN066-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN066-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:13:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   6 unt;   3 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_5,axiom,
    ( big_r(X3,X3)
    | ~ big_q(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G6PVV3UJIc/E---3.1_2051.p',clause_5) ).

cnf(clause_4,axiom,
    ( big_p(X1,X2)
    | big_q(i(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G6PVV3UJIc/E---3.1_2051.p',clause_4) ).

cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_r(a,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G6PVV3UJIc/E---3.1_2051.p',clause_6) ).

cnf(clause_3,axiom,
    ( big_q(h(X1,X2),g(X1))
    | ~ big_p(f(X1,X2),g(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G6PVV3UJIc/E---3.1_2051.p',clause_3) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( big_r(X3,X3)
    | ~ big_q(X1,X2) ),
    clause_5 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( big_p(X1,X2)
    | big_q(i(X1,X2),X1) ),
    clause_4 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_r(a,X1),
    clause_6 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( big_r(X1,X1)
    | big_p(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( big_q(h(X1,X2),g(X1))
    | ~ big_p(f(X1,X2),g(X1)) ),
    clause_3 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    big_p(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    big_q(h(X1,X2),g(X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    big_r(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.15  % Problem    : SYN066-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.09/0.16  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.38  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.38  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:25:29 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G6PVV3UJIc/E---3.1_2051.p
% 0.21/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # sh5l with pid 2200 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2204 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 16
% 0.21/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.21/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 5
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.21/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 5
% 0.21/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.21/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 202
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.000 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------