TSTP Solution File: SYN066+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:09:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SYN066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 09:17:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34 Tue Jul 12 09:17:32 2022
% 0.12/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 18892.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.34 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.34 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 4
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 1
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.16 sec ----> 12 [binary,11.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 2 [] {+} -big_p($f2(A,B),$f3(A))|big_q($f1(A,B),$f3(A)).
% 0.19/0.53 3 [] {+} -big_q(A,B)|big_r(C,C).
% 0.19/0.53 4 [] {+} -big_r($c1,A).
% 0.19/0.53 6 [] {-} big_p(A,B)|big_q($f4(A,B),B).
% 0.19/0.53 8 [hyper,6,3] {-} big_p(A,B)|big_r(C,C).
% 0.19/0.53 9 [hyper,8,4] {-} big_p(A,B).
% 0.19/0.53 10 [hyper,9,2] {-} big_q($f1(A,B),$f3(A)).
% 0.19/0.53 11 [hyper,10,3] {-} big_r(A,A).
% 0.19/0.53 12 [binary,11.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.53 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.19/0.53 false clauses given 5
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 FALSE TRUE
% 0.19/0.53 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 Process 18892 finished Tue Jul 12 09:17:33 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------