TSTP Solution File: SYN065-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN065-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:16:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.74s 1.01s
% Output : Refutation 0.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN065-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 22:26:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 WARNING: denials share constants (see output).
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.74/1.01 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.74/1.01 Process 5488 was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.74/1.01 Mon Jul 11 22:26:30 2022
% 0.74/1.01 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_5335_n013.cluster.edu".
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_5335_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.74/1.01 set(auto2).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.74/1.01 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.74/1.01 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.74/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.74/1.01 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.74/1.01 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.74/1.01 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.74/1.01 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.74/1.01 clear(print_given).
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (7 formulas)
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.74/1.01 1 -big_f(A,B) | -big_f(B,C) | big_h(A,C) # label(clause_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 2 -big_h(a,A) # label(clause_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 Derived: -big_f(a,A) | -big_f(A,B). [resolve(1,c,2,a)].
% 0.74/1.01 3 -big_f(A,B) | -big_g(B,C) | big_h(A,C) # label(clause_4) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 Derived: -big_f(a,A) | -big_g(A,B). [resolve(3,c,2,a)].
% 0.74/1.01 4 -big_g(A,B) | -big_f(B,C) | big_h(A,C) # label(clause_5) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 Derived: -big_g(a,A) | -big_f(A,B). [resolve(4,c,2,a)].
% 0.74/1.01 5 -big_g(A,B) | -big_g(B,C) | big_h(A,C) # label(clause_6) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 Derived: -big_g(a,A) | -big_g(A,B). [resolve(5,c,2,a)].
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Auto_denials:
% 0.74/1.01 % assign(max_proofs, 4). % (Horn set with more than one neg. clause)
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 WARNING, because some of the denials share constants,
% 0.74/1.01 some of the denials or their descendents may be subsumed,
% 0.74/1.01 preventing the target number of proofs from being found.
% 0.74/1.01 The shared constants are: a.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.74/1.01 Function symbol KB weights: a=1. f=1. g=1.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.74/1.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.74/1.01 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.74/1.01 % Length of proof is 6.
% 0.74/1.01 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.74/1.01 % Maximum clause weight is 6.000.
% 0.74/1.01 % Given clauses 3.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 1 -big_f(A,B) | -big_f(B,C) | big_h(A,C) # label(clause_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 2 -big_h(a,A) # label(clause_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 6 big_f(A,f(A)) # label(clause_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.74/1.01 8 -big_f(a,A) | -big_f(A,B). [resolve(1,c,2,a)].
% 0.74/1.01 12 -big_f(f(a),A). [resolve(8,a,6,a)].
% 0.74/1.01 13 $F. [resolve(12,a,6,a)].
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.74/1.01 % Redundant proof: 15 $F. [resolve(14,a,6,a)].
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 % Disable descendants (x means already disabled):
% 0.74/1.01 0x 2x 8x 9x 10 11 12 14
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Given=3. Generated=10. Kept=8. proofs=1.
% 0.74/1.01 Usable=2. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=17. Hints=0.
% 0.74/1.01 Megabytes=0.02.
% 0.74/1.01 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 SEARCH FAILED
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.74/1.01
% 0.74/1.01 Process 5488 exit (sos_empty) Mon Jul 11 22:26:30 2022
% 0.74/1.01 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------