TSTP Solution File: SYN065-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN065-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN065-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:25:24 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.59 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.63 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.63 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % File : SYN065-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.20/0.64 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.64 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 36
% 0.20/0.64 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.64 % English :
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Refs : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.20/0.64 % Source : [Pel86]
% 0.20/0.64 % Names : Pelletier 36 [Pel86]
% 0.20/0.64 % : p36.in [ANL]
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.11 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.08 v5.1.0, 0.06 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.0.1, 0.14 v3.7.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.20/0.64 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of variables : 15 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.20/0.64 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 big_f(X,f(X)) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 big_g(X,g(X)) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ big_f(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.64 | ~ big_f(Y,Z)
% 0.20/0.64 | big_h(X,Z) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause_4,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ big_f(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.64 | ~ big_g(Y,Z)
% 0.20/0.64 | big_h(X,Z) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause_5,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ big_g(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.64 | ~ big_f(Y,Z)
% 0.20/0.64 | big_h(X,Z) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause_6,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ big_g(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.64 | ~ big_g(Y,Z)
% 0.20/0.64 | big_h(X,Z) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.64 ~ big_h(a,X) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.64 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.64 %VarNum:29(SingletonVarNum:15)
% 0.20/0.64 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.64 %SharedTerms:1
% 0.20/0.64 %goalClause: 3
% 0.20/0.64 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.64 [3]~P3(a2,x31)
% 0.20/0.64 [1]P1(x11,f1(x11))
% 0.20/0.64 [2]P2(x21,f3(x21))
% 0.20/0.64 [4]~P1(x41,x43)+P3(x41,x42)+~P1(x43,x42)
% 0.20/0.64 [5]~P2(x51,x53)+P3(x51,x52)+~P1(x53,x52)
% 0.20/0.64 [6]~P2(x63,x62)+P3(x61,x62)+~P1(x61,x63)
% 0.20/0.64 [7]~P2(x71,x73)+P3(x71,x72)+~P2(x73,x72)
% 0.20/0.64 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.20/0.64 ($false),
% 0.20/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,1,5]),
% 0.20/0.64 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.64 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------