TSTP Solution File: SYN065+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SYN065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:59:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.35s 2.29s
% Output   : Proof 7.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SYN065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 08:29:19 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.18/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.18/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.18/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.18/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.18/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.18/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.18/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.18/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.18/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.64/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.28/0.88  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.28/0.94  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.28/0.95  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 1.63/1.09  Prover 0: gave up
% 1.63/1.09  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.63/1.10  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.09/1.16  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.09/1.16  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.09/1.19  Prover 1: gave up
% 2.09/1.19  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.27/1.20  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.27/1.28  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.54/1.28  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.89/1.40  Prover 2: gave up
% 2.89/1.40  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.89/1.41  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.89/1.41  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.04/1.41  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.13/1.44  Prover 3: gave up
% 3.13/1.44  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 3.13/1.44  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.13/1.49  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.13/1.49  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.76/1.63  Prover 4: gave up
% 3.76/1.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.76/1.63  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.76/1.65  Prover 5: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.76/1.65  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.17/1.69  Prover 5: gave up
% 4.17/1.69  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.17/1.70  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.33/1.72  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.33/1.72  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.41/1.77  Prover 6: gave up
% 4.41/1.77  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.41/1.78  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 4.41/1.78  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 6.35/2.29  Prover 7: proved (517ms)
% 6.35/2.29  
% 6.35/2.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 6.35/2.29  
% 6.35/2.29  Generating proof ... found it (size 30)
% 7.46/2.76  
% 7.46/2.76  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.46/2.76  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 7.46/2.76  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ! [v2] : (big_h(v0, v2) | ( ~ big_g(v1, v2) &  ~ big_f(v1, v2))) | ( ~ big_g(v0, v1) &  ~ big_f(v0, v1))) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ big_h(v0, v1) &  ! [v0] :  ? [v1] : big_g(v0, v1) &  ! [v0] :  ? [v1] : big_f(v0, v1)
% 7.46/2.76  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 7.46/2.76  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ! [v2] : (big_h(v0, v2) | ( ~ big_g(v1, v2) &  ~ big_f(v1, v2))) | ( ~ big_g(v0, v1) &  ~ big_f(v0, v1)))
% 7.46/2.76  | (2)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ~ big_h(v0, v1)
% 7.46/2.76  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ? [v1] : big_g(v0, v1)
% 7.46/2.76  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ? [v1] : big_f(v0, v1)
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  | Instantiating (2) with all_0_0_0 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ~ big_h(all_0_0_0, v0)
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  | Introducing new symbol ex_4_0_1 defined by:
% 7.46/2.77  | (6) ex_4_0_1 = all_0_0_0
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  | Instantiating formula (4) with ex_4_0_1 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  | (7)  ? [v0] : big_f(ex_4_0_1, v0)
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  | Instantiating (7) with all_5_0_2 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  | (8) big_f(ex_4_0_1, all_5_0_2)
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  | Introducing new symbol ex_13_1_4 defined by:
% 7.46/2.77  | (9) ex_13_1_4 = all_0_0_0
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  | Introducing new symbol ex_13_0_3 defined by:
% 7.46/2.77  | (10) ex_13_0_3 = all_5_0_2
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  | Instantiating formula (1) with ex_13_0_3, ex_13_1_4 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  | (11)  ! [v0] : (big_h(ex_13_1_4, v0) | ( ~ big_g(ex_13_0_3, v0) &  ~ big_f(ex_13_0_3, v0))) | ( ~ big_g(ex_13_1_4, ex_13_0_3) &  ~ big_f(ex_13_1_4, ex_13_0_3))
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (11), into two cases.
% 7.46/2.77  |-Branch one:
% 7.46/2.77  | (12)  ! [v0] : (big_h(ex_13_1_4, v0) | ( ~ big_g(ex_13_0_3, v0) &  ~ big_f(ex_13_0_3, v0)))
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  	| Introducing new symbol ex_16_0_5 defined by:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (13) ex_16_0_5 = all_5_0_2
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	| Instantiating formula (3) with ex_16_0_5 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (14)  ? [v0] : big_g(ex_16_0_5, v0)
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	| Instantiating (14) with all_17_0_6 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (15) big_g(ex_16_0_5, all_17_0_6)
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	| Introducing new symbol ex_37_0_11 defined by:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (16) ex_37_0_11 = all_17_0_6
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	| Instantiating formula (12) with ex_37_0_11 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (17) big_h(ex_13_1_4, ex_37_0_11) | ( ~ big_g(ex_13_0_3, ex_37_0_11) &  ~ big_f(ex_13_0_3, ex_37_0_11))
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (17), into two cases.
% 7.46/2.77  	|-Branch one:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (18) big_h(ex_13_1_4, ex_37_0_11)
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  		| Instantiating formula (5) with ex_37_0_11 yields:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (19)  ~ big_h(all_0_0_0, ex_37_0_11)
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		| From (9)(16) and (18) follows:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (20) big_h(all_0_0_0, all_17_0_6)
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		| From (16) and (19) follows:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (21)  ~ big_h(all_0_0_0, all_17_0_6)
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		| Using (20) and (21) yields:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (22) $false
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 7.46/2.77  	|-Branch two:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (23)  ~ big_g(ex_13_0_3, ex_37_0_11) &  ~ big_f(ex_13_0_3, ex_37_0_11)
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  		| Applying alpha-rule on (23) yields:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (24)  ~ big_g(ex_13_0_3, ex_37_0_11)
% 7.46/2.77  		| (25)  ~ big_f(ex_13_0_3, ex_37_0_11)
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		| From (13) and (15) follows:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (26) big_g(all_5_0_2, all_17_0_6)
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		| From (10)(16) and (24) follows:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (27)  ~ big_g(all_5_0_2, all_17_0_6)
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		| Using (26) and (27) yields:
% 7.46/2.77  		| (22) $false
% 7.46/2.77  		|
% 7.46/2.77  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 7.46/2.77  |-Branch two:
% 7.46/2.77  | (29)  ~ big_g(ex_13_1_4, ex_13_0_3) &  ~ big_f(ex_13_1_4, ex_13_0_3)
% 7.46/2.77  |
% 7.46/2.77  	| Applying alpha-rule on (29) yields:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (30)  ~ big_g(ex_13_1_4, ex_13_0_3)
% 7.46/2.77  	| (31)  ~ big_f(ex_13_1_4, ex_13_0_3)
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	| From (6) and (8) follows:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (32) big_f(all_0_0_0, all_5_0_2)
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	| From (9)(10) and (31) follows:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (33)  ~ big_f(all_0_0_0, all_5_0_2)
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	| Using (32) and (33) yields:
% 7.46/2.77  	| (22) $false
% 7.46/2.77  	|
% 7.46/2.77  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 7.46/2.77  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.46/2.78  
% 7.46/2.78  2188ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------