TSTP Solution File: SYN065+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SYN065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:40:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 09:02:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.19/0.40 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.40 1. (big_f T_0 T_1) (-. (big_f T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 2. (-. ((big_f T_0 T_1) \/ (big_g T_0 T_1))) (big_f T_0 T_1) ### NotOr 1
% 0.19/0.40 3. (big_g T_1 T_2) (-. (big_g T_1 T_2)) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 4. (-. ((big_f T_1 T_2) \/ (big_g T_1 T_2))) (big_g T_1 T_2) ### NotOr 3
% 0.19/0.40 5. (-. (big_h T_0 T_2)) (big_h T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 6. (((big_f T_1 T_2) \/ (big_g T_1 T_2)) => (big_h T_0 T_2)) (-. (big_h T_0 T_2)) (big_g T_1 T_2) ### Imply 4 5
% 0.19/0.40 7. (All Z, (((big_f T_1 Z) \/ (big_g T_1 Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z))) (big_g T_1 T_2) (-. (big_h T_0 T_2)) ### All 6
% 0.19/0.40 8. (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) (big_g T_1 T_2) (All Z, (((big_f T_1 Z) \/ (big_g T_1 Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z))) ### NotExists 7
% 0.19/0.40 9. (Ex Y, (big_g T_1 Y)) (All Z, (((big_f T_1 Z) \/ (big_g T_1 Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z))) (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) ### Exists 8
% 0.19/0.40 10. (All X, (Ex Y, (big_g X Y))) (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) (All Z, (((big_f T_1 Z) \/ (big_g T_1 Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z))) ### All 9
% 0.19/0.40 11. (((big_f T_0 T_1) \/ (big_g T_0 T_1)) => (All Z, (((big_f T_1 Z) \/ (big_g T_1 Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z)))) (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_g X Y))) (big_f T_0 T_1) ### Imply 2 10
% 0.19/0.40 12. (All Y, (((big_f T_0 Y) \/ (big_g T_0 Y)) => (All Z, (((big_f Y Z) \/ (big_g Y Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z))))) (big_f T_0 T_1) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_g X Y))) (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) ### All 11
% 0.19/0.40 13. (Ex Y, (big_f T_0 Y)) (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_g X Y))) (All Y, (((big_f T_0 Y) \/ (big_g T_0 Y)) => (All Z, (((big_f Y Z) \/ (big_g Y Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z))))) ### Exists 12
% 0.19/0.40 14. (All X, (Ex Y, (big_f X Y))) (All Y, (((big_f T_0 Y) \/ (big_g T_0 Y)) => (All Z, (((big_f Y Z) \/ (big_g Y Z)) => (big_h T_0 Z))))) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_g X Y))) (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) ### All 13
% 0.19/0.40 15. (All X, (All Y, (((big_f X Y) \/ (big_g X Y)) => (All Z, (((big_f Y Z) \/ (big_g Y Z)) => (big_h X Z)))))) (-. (Ex Y, (big_h T_0 Y))) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_g X Y))) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_f X Y))) ### All 14
% 0.19/0.40 16. (-. (All X, (Ex Y, (big_h X Y)))) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_f X Y))) (All X, (Ex Y, (big_g X Y))) (All X, (All Y, (((big_f X Y) \/ (big_g X Y)) => (All Z, (((big_f Y Z) \/ (big_g Y Z)) => (big_h X Z)))))) ### NotAllEx 15
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------