TSTP Solution File: SYN065+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.51s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12 % Problem : SYN065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.05/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:11:26 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.51/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.51/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.51/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.51/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.51/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.51/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.61 % File : SYN065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.51/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.51/0.61 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 36
% 0.51/0.61 % Version : Especial.
% 0.51/0.61 % English :
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.51/0.61 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.51/0.61 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.51/0.61 % Source : [Hah94]
% 0.51/0.61 % Names : Pelletier 36 [Pel86]
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 % Status : Theorem
% 0.51/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.51/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% 0.51/0.61 % Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% 0.51/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.51/0.61 % Number of connectives : 4 ( 0 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% 0.51/0.61 % ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.51/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% 0.51/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.51/0.61 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.51/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.51/0.61 % Number of variables : 9 ( 6 !; 3 ?)
% 0.51/0.61 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 % Comments :
% 0.51/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.61 fof(pel36_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.61 ! [X] :
% 0.51/0.61 ? [Y] : big_f(X,Y) ).
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 fof(pel36_2,axiom,
% 0.51/0.61 ! [X] :
% 0.51/0.61 ? [Y] : big_g(X,Y) ).
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 fof(pel36_3,axiom,
% 0.51/0.61 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.51/0.61 ( ( big_f(X,Y)
% 0.51/0.61 | big_g(X,Y) )
% 0.51/0.61 => ! [Z] :
% 0.51/0.61 ( ( big_f(Y,Z)
% 0.51/0.61 | big_g(Y,Z) )
% 0.51/0.61 => big_h(X,Z) ) ) ).
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 fof(pel36,conjecture,
% 0.51/0.61 ! [X] :
% 0.51/0.61 ? [Y] : big_h(X,Y) ).
% 0.51/0.61
% 0.51/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.51/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.51/0.62 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.51/0.62 %VarNum:29(SingletonVarNum:15)
% 0.51/0.62 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.51/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.51/0.62 %SharedTerms:1
% 0.51/0.62 %goalClause: 3
% 0.51/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.51/0.62 [3]~P3(a3,x31)
% 0.51/0.62 [1]P1(x11,f1(x11))
% 0.51/0.62 [2]P2(x21,f2(x21))
% 0.51/0.62 [4]~P1(x43,x42)+P3(x41,x42)+~P1(x41,x43)
% 0.51/0.62 [5]~P2(x53,x52)+P3(x51,x52)+~P1(x51,x53)
% 0.51/0.62 [6]~P2(x61,x63)+P3(x61,x62)+~P1(x63,x62)
% 0.51/0.62 [7]~P2(x73,x72)+P3(x71,x72)+~P2(x71,x73)
% 0.51/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.51/0.62
% 0.51/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.62 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.51/0.62 ($false),
% 0.51/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,1,5]),
% 0.51/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.51/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.51/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------