TSTP Solution File: SYN063+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SYN063+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 13:11:40 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  276 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :  114 (  10 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  376 ( 126   ~; 169   |;  72   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   36 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (  13 sgn  16   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( ( big_p(a)
          & ( big_p(X1)
           => big_p(b) ) )
       => big_p(c) )
  <=> ! [X2] :
        ( ( ~ big_p(a)
          | big_p(X2)
          | big_p(c) )
        & ( ~ big_p(a)
          | ~ big_p(b)
          | big_p(c) ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpafPTkC/sel_SYN063+1.p_1',pel33) ).

fof(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( big_p(a)
            & ( big_p(X1)
             => big_p(b) ) )
         => big_p(c) )
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(a)
            | big_p(X2)
            | big_p(c) )
          & ( ~ big_p(a)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | big_p(c) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

fof(3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( big_p(a)
            & ( big_p(X1)
             => big_p(b) ) )
         => big_p(c) )
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(a)
            | big_p(X2)
            | big_p(c) )
          & ( ~ big_p(a)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | big_p(c) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[2,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [X1] :
          ( big_p(a)
          & ( ~ big_p(X1)
            | big_p(b) )
          & ~ big_p(c) )
      | ? [X2] :
          ( ( big_p(a)
            & ~ big_p(X2)
            & ~ big_p(c) )
          | ( big_p(a)
            & big_p(b)
            & ~ big_p(c) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X1] :
          ( ~ big_p(a)
          | ( big_p(X1)
            & ~ big_p(b) )
          | big_p(c) )
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(a)
            | big_p(X2)
            | big_p(c) )
          & ( ~ big_p(a)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | big_p(c) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [X3] :
          ( big_p(a)
          & ( ~ big_p(X3)
            | big_p(b) )
          & ~ big_p(c) )
      | ? [X4] :
          ( ( big_p(a)
            & ~ big_p(X4)
            & ~ big_p(c) )
          | ( big_p(a)
            & big_p(b)
            & ~ big_p(c) ) ) )
    & ( ! [X5] :
          ( ~ big_p(a)
          | ( big_p(X5)
            & ~ big_p(b) )
          | big_p(c) )
      | ! [X6] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(a)
            | big_p(X6)
            | big_p(c) )
          & ( ~ big_p(a)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | big_p(c) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

fof(6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( big_p(a)
        & ( ~ big_p(esk1_0)
          | big_p(b) )
        & ~ big_p(c) )
      | ( big_p(a)
        & ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        & ~ big_p(c) )
      | ( big_p(a)
        & big_p(b)
        & ~ big_p(c) ) )
    & ( ! [X5] :
          ( ~ big_p(a)
          | ( big_p(X5)
            & ~ big_p(b) )
          | big_p(c) )
      | ! [X6] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(a)
            | big_p(X6)
            | big_p(c) )
          & ( ~ big_p(a)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | big_p(c) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

fof(7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ big_p(a)
            | big_p(X6)
            | big_p(c) )
          & ( ~ big_p(a)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | big_p(c) ) )
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | ( big_p(X5)
          & ~ big_p(b) )
        | big_p(c) )
      & ( ( big_p(a)
          & ( ~ big_p(esk1_0)
            | big_p(b) )
          & ~ big_p(c) )
        | ( big_p(a)
          & ~ big_p(esk2_0)
          & ~ big_p(c) )
        | ( big_p(a)
          & big_p(b)
          & ~ big_p(c) ) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ( big_p(X5)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(X6)
        | big_p(c) )
      & ( ~ big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(X6)
        | big_p(c) )
      & ( big_p(X5)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(b)
        | big_p(c) )
      & ( ~ big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(b)
        | big_p(c) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | big_p(a)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | big_p(a)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | big_p(a)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | big_p(a) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_0)
        | big_p(b) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( big_p(a)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( big_p(b)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(c) )
      & ( ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(c)
        | ~ big_p(c) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(c)
    | ~ big_p(c)
    | ~ big_p(c) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(35,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(a)
    | big_p(a)
    | big_p(a) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(36,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(c)
    | big_p(c)
    | ~ big_p(b)
    | ~ big_p(a)
    | ~ big_p(a)
    | ~ big_p(b) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(37,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(c)
    | big_p(c)
    | big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_p(b)
    | ~ big_p(a)
    | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(39,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(c)
    | big_p(X1)
    | big_p(c)
    | big_p(X2)
    | ~ big_p(a)
    | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(55,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(c)
    | $false
    | ~ big_p(b) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[36,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(c)
    | ~ big_p(b) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_p(b),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[56,9,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(58,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X2)
    | big_p(X1)
    | big_p(c)
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[39,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X2)
    | big_p(X1)
    | big_p(c) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[58,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X2)
    | big_p(X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[59,9,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(71,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X1)
    | big_p(c)
    | $false
    | ~ big_p(b) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[37,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(72,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X1)
    | big_p(c)
    | ~ big_p(b) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[71,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(73,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_p(b) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[72,9,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(74,negated_conjecture,
    big_p(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[73,60]) ).

cnf(76,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[57,74,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(77,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[76,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(78,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    77,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN063+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpafPTkC/sel_SYN063+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SYN063+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN063+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN063+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------