TSTP Solution File: SYN062+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SYN062+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 13:11:36 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 73 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 76 ( 33 ~; 25 |; 13 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( big_f(X1)
& big_k(X1) )
=> big_j(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpMH0ykf/sel_SYN062+1.p_1',pel32) ).
fof(2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( big_i(X1)
& big_h(X1) )
=> big_j(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpMH0ykf/sel_SYN062+1.p_1',pel32_2) ).
fof(3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( big_k(X1)
=> big_h(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpMH0ykf/sel_SYN062+1.p_1',pel32_3) ).
fof(4,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( big_f(X1)
& ( big_g(X1)
| big_h(X1) ) )
=> big_i(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpMH0ykf/sel_SYN062+1.p_1',pel32_1) ).
fof(5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( big_f(X1)
& big_k(X1) )
=> big_j(X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
fof(6,negated_conjecture,
? [X1] :
( big_f(X1)
& big_k(X1)
& ~ big_j(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
fof(7,negated_conjecture,
? [X2] :
( big_f(X2)
& big_k(X2)
& ~ big_j(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
fof(8,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_0)
& big_k(esk1_0)
& ~ big_j(esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[7]) ).
cnf(9,negated_conjecture,
~ big_j(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
cnf(10,negated_conjecture,
big_k(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
cnf(11,negated_conjecture,
big_f(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
fof(12,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ big_i(X1)
| ~ big_h(X1)
| big_j(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(13,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ big_i(X2)
| ~ big_h(X2)
| big_j(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
cnf(14,plain,
( big_j(X1)
| ~ big_h(X1)
| ~ big_i(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
fof(15,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ big_k(X1)
| big_h(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
fof(16,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ big_k(X2)
| big_h(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
( big_h(X1)
| ~ big_k(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
fof(18,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ big_f(X1)
| ( ~ big_g(X1)
& ~ big_h(X1) )
| big_i(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
fof(19,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ big_f(X2)
| ( ~ big_g(X2)
& ~ big_h(X2) )
| big_i(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
fof(20,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( ~ big_g(X2)
| ~ big_f(X2)
| big_i(X2) )
& ( ~ big_h(X2)
| ~ big_f(X2)
| big_i(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
( big_i(X1)
| ~ big_f(X1)
| ~ big_h(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
cnf(23,negated_conjecture,
big_h(esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17,10,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_h(esk1_0)
| ~ big_i(esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[9,14,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ big_i(esk1_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[24,23,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(26,negated_conjecture,
~ big_i(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[25,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_h(esk1_0)
| ~ big_f(esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[26,21,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(28,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ big_f(esk1_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[27,23,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(29,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[28,11,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[29,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
30,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN062+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpMH0ykf/sel_SYN062+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SYN062+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN062+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN062+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------