TSTP Solution File: SYN062+1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : SYN062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 02:47:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 1.08s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 19:30:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.71/1.08  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.71/1.08  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.71/1.08  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.71/1.08  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  Clauses:
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  { ! big_f( X ), ! big_g( X ), big_i( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  { ! big_f( X ), ! big_h( X ), big_i( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  { ! big_i( X ), ! big_h( X ), big_j( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  { ! big_k( X ), big_h( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  { big_f( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  { big_k( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  { ! big_j( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.71/1.08  This is a near-Horn, non-equality  problem
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  Options Used:
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  useres =            1
% 0.71/1.08  useparamod =        0
% 0.71/1.08  useeqrefl =         0
% 0.71/1.08  useeqfact =         0
% 0.71/1.08  usefactor =         1
% 0.71/1.08  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.71/1.08  usesimpdemod =      0
% 0.71/1.08  usesimpres =        4
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.71/1.08  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.71/1.08  substype =          standard
% 0.71/1.08  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.71/1.08  selectoldest =      5
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.71/1.08  litorderings [1] =  liftord
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  termordering =      none
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  litapriori =        1
% 0.71/1.08  termapriori =       0
% 0.71/1.08  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.71/1.08  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.71/1.08  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.71/1.08  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  litselect =         negative
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  maxweight =         30000
% 0.71/1.08  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.71/1.08  maxlength =         115
% 0.71/1.08  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.71/1.08  excuselevel =       0
% 0.71/1.08  increasemaxweight = 0
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.71/1.08  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  showgenerated =    0
% 0.71/1.08  showkept =         0
% 0.71/1.08  showselected =     0
% 0.71/1.08  showdeleted =      0
% 0.71/1.08  showresimp =       1
% 0.71/1.08  showstatus =       2000
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  prologoutput =     0
% 0.71/1.08  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.71/1.08  totalproof =       1
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  !  [4, 1]      (w:1, o:8, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  big_f  [36, 1]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  big_g  [37, 1]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  big_h  [38, 1]      (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  big_i  [39, 1]      (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  big_j  [40, 1]      (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  big_k  [41, 1]      (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.08  skol1  [42, 0]      (w:1, o:7, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  Starting Search:
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.71/1.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/1.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  (1) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M1} I { big_i( X ), ! big_h( X ), ! big_f( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (2) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M1} I { big_j( X ), ! big_i( X ), ! big_h( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (3) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V1,M1} I { big_h( X ), ! big_k( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (4) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { big_f( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (5) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { big_k( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (6) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! big_j( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (7) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(3,5) { big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (9) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(2,7);r(6) { ! big_i( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (10) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(1,4);r(9) { ! big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (11) {G4,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(10);r(7) {  }.
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/1.08  found a proof!
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.71/1.08  
% 0.71/1.08  (13) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M3}  { ! big_f( X ), ! big_g( X ), big_i( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (14) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M3}  { ! big_f( X ), ! big_h( X ), big_i( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (15) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M3}  { ! big_i( X ), ! big_h( X ), big_j( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.08  (16) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V1,M2}  { ! big_k( X ), big_h( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (17) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { big_f( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (18) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { big_k( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (19) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_j( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Total Proof:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (1) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M1} I { big_i( X ), ! big_h( X ), ! big_f
% 0.71/1.09    ( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (14) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M3}  { ! big_f( X ), ! big_h( X ), big_i( X )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 2
% 0.71/1.09     1 ==> 1
% 0.71/1.09     2 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (2) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M1} I { big_j( X ), ! big_i( X ), ! big_h
% 0.71/1.09    ( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (15) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M3}  { ! big_i( X ), ! big_h( X ), big_j( X )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.71/1.09     1 ==> 2
% 0.71/1.09     2 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (3) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V1,M1} I { big_h( X ), ! big_k( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (16) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V1,M2}  { ! big_k( X ), big_h( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.71/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (4) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { big_f( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (17) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { big_f( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (5) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { big_k( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (18) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { big_k( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (6) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! big_j( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (19) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_j( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (20) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[1]: (3) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V1,M1} I { big_h( X ), ! big_k( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (5) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { big_k( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := skol1
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (7) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(3,5) { big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (20) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (21) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { big_j( skol1 ), ! big_i( skol1 )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[2]: (2) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M1} I { big_j( X ), ! big_i( X ), ! big_h( 
% 0.71/1.09    X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (7) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(3,5) { big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := skol1
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (22) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_i( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (6) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! big_j( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (21) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { big_j( skol1 ), ! big_i( skol1 )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (9) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(2,7);r(6) { ! big_i( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (22) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_i( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (23) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { big_i( skol1 ), ! big_h( skol1 )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[2]: (1) {G0,W8,D2,L3,V1,M1} I { big_i( X ), ! big_h( X ), ! big_f( 
% 0.71/1.09    X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (4) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { big_f( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := skol1
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (24) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (9) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(2,7);r(6) { ! big_i( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (23) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { big_i( skol1 ), ! big_h( skol1 )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (10) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(1,4);r(9) { ! big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (24) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (25) {G2,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (10) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(1,4);r(9) { ! big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (7) {G1,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(3,5) { big_h( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (11) {G4,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(10);r(7) {  }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (25) {G2,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Proof check complete!
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Memory use:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  space for terms:        148
% 0.71/1.09  space for clauses:      627
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  clauses generated:      12
% 0.71/1.09  clauses kept:           12
% 0.71/1.09  clauses selected:       10
% 0.71/1.09  clauses deleted:        1
% 0.71/1.09  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsentry:          0
% 0.71/1.09  literals s-matched: 0
% 0.71/1.09  literals matched:   0
% 0.71/1.09  full subsumption:   0
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  checksum:           -574649712
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------