TSTP Solution File: SYN061+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SYN061+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 03:26:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.49s 1.17s
% Output   : Proof 4.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN061+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:31:07 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.53/0.93  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.53/0.93  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.10/0.98  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.10/0.98  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.10/0.98  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.10/0.98  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.10/0.98  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.61/1.05  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 2.61/1.05  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 2.61/1.07  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.61/1.07  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 2.61/1.07  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.61/1.08  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.61/1.10  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 3.08/1.13  Prover 3: gave up
% 3.08/1.13  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.08/1.14  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.08/1.14  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.08/1.15  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.08/1.16  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.49/1.17  Prover 2: proved (548ms)
% 3.49/1.17  
% 3.49/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.49/1.17  
% 3.49/1.17  Prover 0: stopped
% 3.49/1.18  Prover 5: stopped
% 3.49/1.18  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.49/1.18  Prover 6: stopped
% 3.49/1.18  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.49/1.18  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.49/1.18  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.49/1.18  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.49/1.19  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.49/1.19  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 3.49/1.20  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 3.49/1.21  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.49/1.21  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.49/1.21  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.49/1.22  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.49/1.22  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.49/1.22  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.49/1.23  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.49/1.23  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.49/1.23  Prover 7: gave up
% 3.49/1.23  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.49/1.23  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.49/1.23  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 3.49/1.24  Prover 10: gave up
% 3.49/1.24  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 3.49/1.24  Prover 13: gave up
% 3.49/1.25  Prover 4: Found proof (size 20)
% 3.49/1.25  Prover 4: proved (623ms)
% 3.49/1.25  Prover 8: stopped
% 3.49/1.25  Prover 16: stopped
% 3.49/1.25  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.19/1.26  Prover 11: stopped
% 4.19/1.27  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.19/1.28  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.19/1.28  Prover 19: stopped
% 4.19/1.28  
% 4.19/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.19/1.28  
% 4.19/1.29  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 4.19/1.29  Assumptions after simplification:
% 4.19/1.29  ---------------------------------
% 4.19/1.29  
% 4.19/1.29    (pel31)
% 4.35/1.32     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_j(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 4.35/1.32        big_i(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_i(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1:
% 4.35/1.32        int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & big_j(v0) = v1))
% 4.35/1.32  
% 4.35/1.32    (pel31_1)
% 4.35/1.33     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (big_g(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :
% 4.35/1.33       ? [v3: any] : (big_f(v0) = v2 & big_h(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | ( ~ (v3 =
% 4.35/1.33              0) &  ~ (v1 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (big_h(v0) =
% 4.35/1.33        v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] : (big_g(v0) = v3 &
% 4.35/1.33        big_f(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = 0))))) &  ! [v0:
% 4.35/1.33      $i] : ( ~ (big_f(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2: int] : ( ~
% 4.35/1.33        (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = 0) & big_g(v0) = v1 & big_h(v0) = v2))
% 4.35/1.33  
% 4.35/1.33    (pel31_2)
% 4.35/1.33     ? [v0: $i] : (big_i(v0) = 0 & big_f(v0) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 4.35/1.33  
% 4.35/1.33    (pel31_3)
% 4.35/1.33     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_j(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 4.35/1.33      big_h(v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_h(v0) = v1)
% 4.35/1.33      |  ~ $i(v0) | big_j(v0) = 0)
% 4.35/1.33  
% 4.35/1.33    (function-axioms)
% 4.35/1.33     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 4.35/1.33      v0 |  ~ (big_j(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_j(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool]
% 4.35/1.33    :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_i(v2) = v1) | 
% 4.35/1.33      ~ (big_i(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 4.35/1.33      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_g(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 4.35/1.33      (big_g(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool]
% 4.35/1.33    :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_f(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_f(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 4.35/1.33    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 4.35/1.33      |  ~ (big_h(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_h(v2) = v0))
% 4.35/1.33  
% 4.35/1.33  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 4.35/1.33  ---------------------------------
% 4.35/1.33  
% 4.35/1.33  Begin of proof
% 4.35/1.34  | 
% 4.35/1.34  | ALPHA: (pel31_1) implies:
% 4.35/1.34  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_f(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: int] :  ? [v2:
% 4.35/1.34  |            int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = 0) & big_g(v0) = v1 & big_h(v0) =
% 4.35/1.34  |            v2))
% 4.35/1.34  | 
% 4.35/1.34  | ALPHA: (pel31_3) implies:
% 4.35/1.34  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_h(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0)
% 4.35/1.34  |          | big_j(v0) = 0)
% 4.35/1.34  | 
% 4.35/1.34  | ALPHA: (pel31) implies:
% 4.35/1.34  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_i(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1
% 4.35/1.34  |              = 0) & big_j(v0) = v1))
% 4.35/1.34  | 
% 4.35/1.34  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 4.35/1.34  |   (4)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 4.35/1.34  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_j(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_j(v2) = v0))
% 4.35/1.34  | 
% 4.35/1.34  | DELTA: instantiating (pel31_2) with fresh symbol all_6_0 gives:
% 4.35/1.34  |   (5)  big_i(all_6_0) = 0 & big_f(all_6_0) = 0 & $i(all_6_0)
% 4.35/1.34  | 
% 4.35/1.34  | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 4.35/1.34  |   (6)  $i(all_6_0)
% 4.35/1.34  |   (7)  big_f(all_6_0) = 0
% 4.35/1.34  |   (8)  big_i(all_6_0) = 0
% 4.35/1.34  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_6_0, simplifying with (6), (7) gives:
% 4.35/1.35  |   (9)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 4.35/1.35  |          big_g(all_6_0) = v0 & big_h(all_6_0) = v1)
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_6_0, simplifying with (6), (8) gives:
% 4.35/1.35  |   (10)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & big_j(all_6_0) = v0)
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | DELTA: instantiating (10) with fresh symbol all_13_0 gives:
% 4.35/1.35  |   (11)   ~ (all_13_0 = 0) & big_j(all_6_0) = all_13_0
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | ALPHA: (11) implies:
% 4.35/1.35  |   (12)   ~ (all_13_0 = 0)
% 4.35/1.35  |   (13)  big_j(all_6_0) = all_13_0
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | DELTA: instantiating (9) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1 gives:
% 4.35/1.35  |   (14)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_15_1 = 0) & big_g(all_6_0) = all_15_1 &
% 4.35/1.35  |         big_h(all_6_0) = all_15_0
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 4.35/1.35  |   (15)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0)
% 4.35/1.35  |   (16)  big_h(all_6_0) = all_15_0
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_6_0, all_15_0, simplifying with (6),
% 4.35/1.35  |              (16) gives:
% 4.35/1.35  |   (17)  all_15_0 = 0 | big_j(all_6_0) = 0
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | BETA: splitting (17) gives:
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  | Case 1:
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | |   (18)  big_j(all_6_0) = 0
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_13_0, 0, all_6_0, simplifying with
% 4.35/1.35  | |              (13), (18) gives:
% 4.35/1.35  | |   (19)  all_13_0 = 0
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | | REDUCE: (12), (19) imply:
% 4.35/1.35  | |   (20)  $false
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | | CLOSE: (20) is inconsistent.
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | Case 2:
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | |   (21)  all_15_0 = 0
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | | REDUCE: (15), (21) imply:
% 4.35/1.35  | |   (22)  $false
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | | CLOSE: (22) is inconsistent.
% 4.35/1.35  | | 
% 4.35/1.35  | End of split
% 4.35/1.35  | 
% 4.35/1.35  End of proof
% 4.35/1.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 4.35/1.36  
% 4.35/1.36  753ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------