TSTP Solution File: SYN061+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN061+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:22:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN061+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 01:26:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.13/0.35 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.13/0.35 [0.000040s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 Start search
% 0.13/0.35 nb_step : 1 - limit : 4
% 0.13/0.35 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 [0] ALPHA_AND : (~? [X1_1] : ((big_f(X1_1) & (big_g(X1_1) | big_h(X1_1)))) & ? [X2_2] : ((big_i(X2_2) & big_f(X2_2))) & ! [X3_3] : ((~big_h(X3_3) => big_j(X3_3))) & ~? [X4_4] : ((big_i(X4_4) & big_j(X4_4))))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [1] ~? [X1_1] : ((big_f(X1_1) & (big_g(X1_1) | big_h(X1_1)))), ? [X2_2] : ((big_i(X2_2) & big_f(X2_2))), ! [X3_3] : ((~big_h(X3_3) => big_j(X3_3))), ~? [X4_4] : ((big_i(X4_4) & big_j(X4_4)))
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [1] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X2_2] : ((big_i(X2_2) & big_f(X2_2)))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [2] (big_i(skolem_X22) & big_f(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [2] ALPHA_AND : (big_i(skolem_X22) & big_f(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [3] big_i(skolem_X22), big_f(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [3] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X1_1] : ((big_f(X1_1) & (big_g(X1_1) | big_h(X1_1))))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [4] ~(big_f(skolem_X22) & (big_g(skolem_X22) | big_h(skolem_X22)))
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [4] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(big_f(skolem_X22) & (big_g(skolem_X22) | big_h(skolem_X22)))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [5] ~big_f(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37 -> [6] ~(big_g(skolem_X22) | big_h(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [5] CLOSURE : ~big_f(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [6] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(big_g(skolem_X22) | big_h(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [7] ~big_g(skolem_X22), ~big_h(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [7] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X3_3] : ((~big_h(X3_3) => big_j(X3_3)))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [8] (~big_h(skolem_X22) => big_j(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [8] BETA_IMPLY : (~big_h(skolem_X22) => big_j(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [9] ~~big_h(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37 -> [10] big_j(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [10] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X4_4] : ((big_i(X4_4) & big_j(X4_4)))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [12] ~(big_i(skolem_X22) & big_j(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [12] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(big_i(skolem_X22) & big_j(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.37 -> [13] ~big_i(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37 -> [14] ~big_j(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [13] CLOSURE : ~big_i(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [14] CLOSURE : ~big_j(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 [11] CLOSURE : big_h(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 [0.017332s][1][Res] 81 goroutines created
% 0.13/0.37 ==== Result ====
% 0.13/0.37 [0.017364s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------