TSTP Solution File: SYN060-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN060-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:15:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.96s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN060-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:35:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.96 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.96 Process 27603 was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.96 Mon Jul 11 21:35:48 2022
% 0.42/0.96 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_27450_n029.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_27450_n029.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.96 set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.96 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.96 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.96 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.96 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.96 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.96 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.96 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.96 clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (7 formulas)
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.96 1 -big_g(A) | -big_h(A) # label(clause_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 2 big_g(A) | big_f(A) # label(clause_2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 3 big_g(A) | big_h(A) # label(clause_4) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 Derived: -big_h(A) | big_f(A). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 4 -big_i(a) # label(clause_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 5 big_i(A) | big_f(A) # label(clause_5) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 6 big_i(A) | big_h(A) # label(clause_6) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 Derived: big_f(a). [resolve(4,a,5,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 Derived: big_h(a). [resolve(4,a,6,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 7 -big_h(A) | big_f(A). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 8 -big_f(A) | -big_h(A) # label(clause_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 Derived: -big_h(A) | -big_h(A). [resolve(7,b,8,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 9 big_f(a). [resolve(4,a,5,a)].
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 Auto_denials: (no changes).
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.96 Function symbol KB weights: a=1.
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.42/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.96 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.42/0.96 % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.42/0.96 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.42/0.96 % Maximum clause weight is 2.000.
% 0.42/0.96 % Given clauses 0.
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 1 -big_g(A) | -big_h(A) # label(clause_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 2 big_g(A) | big_f(A) # label(clause_2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 4 -big_i(a) # label(clause_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 6 big_i(A) | big_h(A) # label(clause_6) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 7 -big_h(A) | big_f(A). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 8 -big_f(A) | -big_h(A) # label(clause_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.96 10 big_h(a). [resolve(4,a,6,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 11 -big_h(A) | -big_h(A). [resolve(7,b,8,a)].
% 0.42/0.96 12 -big_h(A). [copy(11),merge(b)].
% 0.42/0.96 13 $F. [resolve(12,a,10,a)].
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 Given=0. Generated=2. Kept=2. proofs=1.
% 0.42/0.96 Usable=0. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=11. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.96 Megabytes=0.02.
% 0.42/0.96 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.42/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.42/0.96
% 0.42/0.96 Process 27603 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 21:35:48 2022
% 0.42/0.96 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------