TSTP Solution File: SYN060+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN060+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN060+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 21:12:38 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % File : SYN060+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.20/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 30
% 0.20/0.61 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.61 % English :
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.20/0.61 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.20/0.61 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.61 % Source : [Hah94]
% 0.20/0.61 % Names : Pelletier 30 [Pel86]
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of connectives : 7 ( 2 ~; 1 |; 1 &)
% 0.20/0.61 % ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg)
% 0.20/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.61 % Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% 0.20/0.61 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 fof(pel30_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.61 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.61 ( ( big_f(X)
% 0.20/0.61 | big_g(X) )
% 0.20/0.61 => ~ big_h(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 fof(pel30_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.61 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.61 ( ( big_g(X)
% 0.20/0.61 => ~ big_i(X) )
% 0.20/0.61 => ( big_f(X)
% 0.20/0.61 & big_h(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 fof(pel30,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 ! [X] : big_i(X) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.61 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.61 %VarNum:12(SingletonVarNum:6)
% 0.20/0.61 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.61 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.20/0.61 %goalClause: 1
% 0.20/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.61 [1]~P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.61 [2]P3(x21)+P2(x21)
% 0.20/0.61 [3]P1(x31)+P2(x31)
% 0.20/0.61 [4]P4(x41)+P3(x41)
% 0.20/0.61 [5]P1(x51)+P4(x51)
% 0.20/0.61 [6]~P4(x61)+~P2(x61)
% 0.20/0.61 [7]~P4(x71)+~P3(x71)
% 0.20/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.20/0.62 ($false),
% 0.20/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,3,6]),
% 0.20/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------