TSTP Solution File: SYN059-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN059-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:28:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause_10)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| big_j(X3)
| ~ big_g(X1)
| ~ big_f(X2)
| ~ big_g(X3) ),
clause_10,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
big_g(b),
clause_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
big_f(a),
clause_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| big_h(X2)
| ~ big_f(X2)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(d)
| big_j(X2)
| ~ big_f(X1)
| ~ big_g(X2) ),
clause_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
big_f(e),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
big_h(e),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_58]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
big_f(c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_58]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| ~ big_j(f)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_63])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
big_h(c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_69]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| big_g(f)
| ~ big_g(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_63])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(d)
| big_g(f) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_63])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_j(f)
| ~ big_j(d) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]),c_0_67]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| ~ big_j(d)
| ~ big_g(X2)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_94,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| ~ big_j(d)
| ~ big_g(X1)
| ~ big_f(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_80])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| big_g(f)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_63])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(d)
| big_g(f) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(f)
| ~ big_j(f) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_77]),c_0_67]),c_0_86]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| ~ big_j(f)
| ~ big_g(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_63])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(d)
| ~ big_j(f) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_63])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| big_h(X2)
| ~ big_g(X1)
| ~ big_f(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| big_g(d)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
big_j(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_36]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
big_h(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_36]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SYN059-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:38:16 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IUjNgB7Asd/E---3.1_18252.p
% 0.20/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18329 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.52 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 18337 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.52 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # No proof found!
% 0.20/0.52 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.20/0.52 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 32
% 0.20/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses : 32
% 0.20/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 32
% 0.20/0.52 # Processed clauses : 165
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # ...subsumed : 27
% 0.20/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 138
% 0.20/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 55
% 0.20/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 27
% 0.20/0.52 # Generated clauses : 174
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 174
% 0.20/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 12
% 0.20/0.52 # Paramodulations : 174
% 0.20/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 38
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.20/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 114
% 0.20/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 248
% 0.20/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 127
% 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 84
% 0.20/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 0.20/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.20/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3185
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.035 s
% 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------