TSTP Solution File: SYN047+1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SYN047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 08:58:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  152 (  57   ~;  39   |;  37   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   5 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel17,conjecture,
    ( ( ( p
        & ( q
         => r ) )
     => s )
  <=> ( ( ~ p
        | q
        | s )
      & ( ~ p
        | ~ r
        | s ) ) ) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ( ( ( ( p
          & ( q
           => r ) )
       => s )
      & ~ ~ p
      & ~ q )
   => s ),
    inference(strip,[],[pel17]) ).

fof(subgoal_1,plain,
    ( ( ( ( p
          & ( q
           => r ) )
       => s )
      & ( ~ p
        | q
        | s )
      & ~ ~ p
      & ~ ~ r )
   => s ),
    inference(strip,[],[pel17]) ).

fof(subgoal_2,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ p
        | q
        | s )
      & ( ~ p
        | ~ r
        | s )
      & p
      & ( q
       => r ) )
   => s ),
    inference(strip,[],[pel17]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( ( p
            & ( q
             => r ) )
         => s )
        & ~ ~ p
        & ~ q )
     => s ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ q
    & ~ s
    & p
    & ( ~ p
      | s
      | ( ~ r
        & q ) ) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ p
    | s
    | ( ~ r
      & q ) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    p,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ~ s,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ~ q,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplify,[],[normalize_0_1,normalize_0_2,normalize_0_3,normalize_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

fof(negate_1_0,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( ( p
            & ( q
             => r ) )
         => s )
        & ( ~ p
          | q
          | s )
        & ~ ~ p
        & ~ ~ r )
     => s ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_1]) ).

fof(normalize_1_0,plain,
    ( ~ s
    & p
    & r
    & ( ~ p
      | q
      | s )
    & ( ~ p
      | s
      | ( ~ r
        & q ) ) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_1,plain,
    ( ~ p
    | s
    | ( ~ r
      & q ) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_2,plain,
    p,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_3,plain,
    ~ s,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_4,plain,
    r,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_5,plain,
    ( ~ p
    | q
    | s ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_6,plain,
    q,
    inference(simplify,[],[normalize_1_5,normalize_1_2,normalize_1_3]) ).

fof(normalize_1_7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplify,[],[normalize_1_1,normalize_1_2,normalize_1_3,normalize_1_4,normalize_1_6]) ).

cnf(refute_1_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_1_7]) ).

fof(negate_2_0,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( ~ p
          | q
          | s )
        & ( ~ p
          | ~ r
          | s )
        & p
        & ( q
         => r ) )
     => s ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_2]) ).

fof(normalize_2_0,plain,
    ( ~ s
    & p
    & ( ~ q
      | r )
    & ( ~ p
      | ~ r
      | s )
    & ( ~ p
      | q
      | s ) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_2_0]) ).

fof(normalize_2_1,plain,
    ( ~ q
    | r ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_2_0]) ).

fof(normalize_2_2,plain,
    ( ~ p
    | q
    | s ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_2_0]) ).

fof(normalize_2_3,plain,
    p,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_2_0]) ).

fof(normalize_2_4,plain,
    ~ s,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_2_0]) ).

fof(normalize_2_5,plain,
    q,
    inference(simplify,[],[normalize_2_2,normalize_2_3,normalize_2_4]) ).

fof(normalize_2_6,plain,
    ( ~ p
    | ~ r
    | s ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_2_0]) ).

fof(normalize_2_7,plain,
    ~ r,
    inference(simplify,[],[normalize_2_6,normalize_2_3,normalize_2_4]) ).

cnf(refute_2_0,plain,
    ( ~ q
    | r ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_2_1]) ).

cnf(refute_2_1,plain,
    q,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_2_5]) ).

cnf(refute_2_2,plain,
    r,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( q )],[refute_2_1,refute_2_0]) ).

cnf(refute_2_3,plain,
    ~ r,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_2_7]) ).

cnf(refute_2_4,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( r )],[refute_2_2,refute_2_3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SYN047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 07:42:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------