TSTP Solution File: SYN044+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SYN044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:59:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.40s 0.98s
% Output   : Proof 1.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SYN044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 23:38:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.61/0.61          ____       _                          
% 0.61/0.61    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.61/0.61   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.61/0.61  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.61/0.61  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.61/0.61  
% 0.61/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.61/0.61  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.61/0.61  
% 0.61/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.61/0.61  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.61/0.61  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.61/0.61  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.61/0.61  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.61/0.61  
% 0.61/0.61  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.61/0.61  
% 0.61/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.71/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.27/0.89  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.40/0.93  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 1.40/0.98  Prover 0: proved (317ms)
% 1.40/0.98  
% 1.40/0.98  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 1.40/0.98  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.40/0.98  
% 1.40/0.98  Generating proof ... found it (size 30)
% 1.67/1.09  
% 1.67/1.09  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 1.67/1.09  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 1.67/1.09  | (0) ( ~ p | r | q) & ( ~ r | (p & q)) & ( ~ q | r) & ((p &  ~ q) | (q &  ~ p))
% 1.67/1.09  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 1.67/1.09  | (1)  ~ p | r | q
% 1.67/1.09  | (2)  ~ r | (p & q)
% 1.67/1.09  | (3)  ~ q | r
% 1.67/1.09  | (4) (p &  ~ q) | (q &  ~ p)
% 1.67/1.09  |
% 1.67/1.09  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3), into two cases.
% 1.67/1.09  |-Branch one:
% 1.67/1.09  | (5)  ~ q
% 1.67/1.09  |
% 1.67/1.09  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2), into two cases.
% 1.67/1.09  	|-Branch one:
% 1.67/1.09  	| (6)  ~ r
% 1.67/1.10  	|
% 1.67/1.10  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1), into two cases.
% 1.67/1.10  		|-Branch one:
% 1.67/1.10  		| (7) q
% 1.67/1.10  		|
% 1.80/1.10  			| Using (7) and (5) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  			| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.10  			|
% 1.80/1.10  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.10  		|-Branch two:
% 1.80/1.10  		| (5)  ~ q
% 1.80/1.10  		| (10)  ~ p | r
% 1.80/1.10  		|
% 1.80/1.10  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (4), into two cases.
% 1.80/1.10  			|-Branch one:
% 1.80/1.10  			| (11) p &  ~ q
% 1.80/1.10  			|
% 1.80/1.10  				| Applying alpha-rule on (11) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  				| (12) p
% 1.80/1.10  				| (5)  ~ q
% 1.80/1.10  				|
% 1.80/1.10  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (10), into two cases.
% 1.80/1.10  				|-Branch one:
% 1.80/1.10  				| (14)  ~ p
% 1.80/1.10  				|
% 1.80/1.10  					| Using (12) and (14) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  					| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.10  					|
% 1.80/1.10  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.10  				|-Branch two:
% 1.80/1.10  				| (12) p
% 1.80/1.10  				| (17) r
% 1.80/1.10  				|
% 1.80/1.10  					| Using (17) and (6) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  					| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.10  					|
% 1.80/1.10  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.10  			|-Branch two:
% 1.80/1.10  			| (19) q &  ~ p
% 1.80/1.10  			|
% 1.80/1.10  				| Applying alpha-rule on (19) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  				| (7) q
% 1.80/1.10  				| (14)  ~ p
% 1.80/1.10  				|
% 1.80/1.10  				| Using (7) and (5) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  				| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.10  				|
% 1.80/1.10  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.10  	|-Branch two:
% 1.80/1.10  	| (17) r
% 1.80/1.10  	| (24) p & q
% 1.80/1.10  	|
% 1.80/1.10  		| Applying alpha-rule on (24) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  		| (12) p
% 1.80/1.10  		| (7) q
% 1.80/1.10  		|
% 1.80/1.10  		| Using (7) and (5) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  		| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.10  		|
% 1.80/1.10  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.10  |-Branch two:
% 1.80/1.10  | (7) q
% 1.80/1.10  | (17) r
% 1.80/1.10  |
% 1.80/1.10  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2), into two cases.
% 1.80/1.10  	|-Branch one:
% 1.80/1.10  	| (6)  ~ r
% 1.80/1.10  	|
% 1.80/1.10  		| Using (17) and (6) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  		| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.10  		|
% 1.80/1.10  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.10  	|-Branch two:
% 1.80/1.10  	| (17) r
% 1.80/1.10  	| (24) p & q
% 1.80/1.10  	|
% 1.80/1.10  		| Applying alpha-rule on (24) yields:
% 1.80/1.10  		| (12) p
% 1.80/1.10  		| (7) q
% 1.80/1.10  		|
% 1.80/1.10  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (4), into two cases.
% 1.80/1.10  		|-Branch one:
% 1.80/1.10  		| (11) p &  ~ q
% 1.80/1.11  		|
% 1.80/1.11  			| Applying alpha-rule on (11) yields:
% 1.80/1.11  			| (12) p
% 1.80/1.11  			| (5)  ~ q
% 1.80/1.11  			|
% 1.80/1.11  			| Using (7) and (5) yields:
% 1.80/1.11  			| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.11  			|
% 1.80/1.11  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.11  		|-Branch two:
% 1.80/1.11  		| (19) q &  ~ p
% 1.80/1.11  		|
% 1.80/1.11  			| Applying alpha-rule on (19) yields:
% 1.80/1.11  			| (7) q
% 1.80/1.11  			| (14)  ~ p
% 1.80/1.11  			|
% 1.80/1.11  			| Using (12) and (14) yields:
% 1.80/1.11  			| (8) $false
% 1.80/1.11  			|
% 1.80/1.11  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 1.80/1.11  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 1.80/1.11  
% 1.80/1.11  489ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------