TSTP Solution File: SYN044+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN044+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:12:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 14 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 4 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel10,conjecture,
( p
<=> q ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q8UeTHImpR/E---3.1_25056.p',pel10) ).
fof(pel10_3,axiom,
( p
=> ( q
| r ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q8UeTHImpR/E---3.1_25056.p',pel10_3) ).
fof(pel10_1,axiom,
( q
=> r ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q8UeTHImpR/E---3.1_25056.p',pel10_1) ).
fof(pel10_2,axiom,
( r
=> ( p
& q ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q8UeTHImpR/E---3.1_25056.p',pel10_2) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( p
<=> q ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel10]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ p
| q
| r ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel10_3]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ p
| ~ q )
& ( p
| q ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ q
| r ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel10_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( ( p
| ~ r )
& ( q
| ~ r ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel10_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( q
| r
| ~ p ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p
| q ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( r
| ~ q ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( p
| ~ r ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
r,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| ~ q ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
p,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( q
| ~ r ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ q,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_13])]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : SYN044+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.31 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:18:50 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q8UeTHImpR/E---3.1_25056.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # new_bool_1 with pid 25137 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25140 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.17/0.44 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.17/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.17/0.44 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.17/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.17/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 173
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.17/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------