TSTP Solution File: SYN041-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SYN041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:36:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    1
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    3 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    3 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    1 (   1   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   2 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_instgen_refutation,[],[f3,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ~ q,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    q,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : SYN041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 21:22:20 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.46  % (18923)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/99Mi)
% 0.16/0.47  % (18915)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.47  % (18921)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.16/0.47  % (18921)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.48  % (18932)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/500Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (18913)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  The problem is propositional so there are no sorts!
% 0.16/0.48  TRYING []
% 0.16/0.48  % (18923)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.48  
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48  % (18921)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48  % (18906)Success in time 0.158 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------