TSTP Solution File: SYN039-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:17:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SYN039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 16:39:49 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS derived 159 clauses, backtracked 43 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 166 clauses.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS allocated 63271 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 45 :
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.44  2[0:Inp] || s(u,f1(u,v))+ -> q(f1(u,v),w)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  5[0:Inp] ||  -> q(f1(u,v),w)* s(f1(u,v),x)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  9[0:Inp] || q(u,u)* s(v,v) -> p(f1(w,v),f1(w,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  11[0:Inp] || p(u,u) s(u,f1(u,v))*+ -> q(f1(u,v),w)*.
% 0.20/0.44  14[0:Inp] || p(u,u)*+ -> q(f1(u,v),w)* s(f1(u,v),x)*.
% 0.20/0.44  18[0:Inp] || p(u,u)* q(v,v)* s(w,w)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  21[0:Inp] || s(u,u)* s(v,f1(v,u))*+ -> s(w,v)*.
% 0.20/0.44  25[0:Inp] || q(u,u)* q(v,f1(w,v))*+ -> s(x,w)*.
% 0.20/0.44  28[0:MRR:9.2,18.0] || s(u,u)*+ q(v,v)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  29[1:Spt:25.1,25.2] || q(u,f1(v,u))*+ -> s(w,v)*.
% 0.20/0.44  32[2:Spt:28.0] || s(u,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  43[1:Res:5.0,29.0] ||  -> s(f1(u,v),w)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))* s(x,y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  48[2:Res:5.1,32.0] ||  -> q(f1(u,v),w)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  52[1:Con:43.2] ||  -> s(f1(u,v),w)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  53[2:Res:48.0,29.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))* s(w,x)*.
% 0.20/0.44  58[3:Spt:53.1] ||  -> s(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.44  59[3:UnC:58.0,32.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  60[3:Spt:59.0,53.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  61[3:Res:60.0,14.0] ||  -> q(f1(f1(u,v),w),x)* s(f1(f1(u,v),w),y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  62[3:Res:61.0,29.0] ||  -> s(f1(f1(u,v),w),x)* s(y,z)*.
% 0.20/0.44  69[3:Con:62.1] ||  -> s(f1(f1(u,v),w),x)*.
% 0.20/0.44  70[3:UnC:69.0,32.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  71[2:Spt:70.0,28.1] || q(u,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  76[1:Res:52.0,21.1] || s(u,u)*+ -> p(f1(v,w),f1(v,w))* s(x,f1(v,w))*.
% 0.20/0.44  89[1:Res:52.0,76.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))* p(f1(w,x),f1(w,x))* s(y,f1(w,x))*.
% 0.20/0.44  90[1:Con:89.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))* s(w,f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  91[1:MRR:2.0,90.1] ||  -> q(f1(u,v),w)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  97[2:Res:91.0,71.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  100[2:Res:97.0,14.0] ||  -> q(f1(f1(u,v),w),x)* s(f1(f1(u,v),w),y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  103[2:Res:100.0,71.0] ||  -> s(f1(f1(u,v),w),x)*.
% 0.20/0.44  113[2:Res:103.0,11.1] || p(f1(f1(u,v),w),f1(f1(u,v),w))* -> q(f1(f1(f1(u,v),w),x),y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  120[2:MRR:113.0,97.0] ||  -> q(f1(f1(f1(u,v),w),x),y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  121[2:UnC:120.0,71.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  122[1:Spt:121.0,25.0] || q(u,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  139[1:Res:5.0,122.0] ||  -> s(f1(u,v),w)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  159[1:Res:139.0,21.1] || s(u,u)*+ -> p(f1(v,w),f1(v,w))* s(x,f1(v,w))*.
% 0.20/0.44  166[1:Res:139.0,159.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))* p(f1(w,x),f1(w,x))* s(y,f1(w,x))*.
% 0.20/0.44  167[1:Con:166.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))* s(w,f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  168[1:MRR:2.0,167.1] ||  -> q(f1(u,v),w)* p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  174[1:Res:168.0,122.0] ||  -> p(f1(u,v),f1(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.44  181[1:Res:174.0,14.0] ||  -> q(f1(f1(u,v),w),x)* s(f1(f1(u,v),w),y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  194[1:Res:181.0,122.0] ||  -> s(f1(f1(u,v),w),x)*.
% 0.20/0.44  206[1:Res:194.0,11.1] || p(f1(f1(u,v),w),f1(f1(u,v),w))* -> q(f1(f1(f1(u,v),w),x),y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  213[1:MRR:206.0,174.0] ||  -> q(f1(f1(f1(u,v),w),x),y)*.
% 0.20/0.44  214[1:UnC:213.0,122.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : c_2 c_5 c_9 c_11 c_14 c_18 c_21 c_25
% 0.20/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------