TSTP Solution File: SYN039-1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SYN039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:48:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.27s
% Output : Proof 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
( ~ p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| ~ s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| ~ s(sG,sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_12)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ s(sG,f1(sG,sG))
| ~ s(sG,sG)
| p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_3)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| q(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,f1(sG,sG))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_5)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| q(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_5)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| ~ s(sG,sG)
| s(sG,f1(sG,sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_21)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ s(sG,f1(sG,sG))
| p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| q(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_2)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| ~ s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_11)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| ~ s(sG,sG)
| s(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_15)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| s(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(sG,f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_14)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ q(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| ~ q(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,f1(sG,sG)))
| s(sG,sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_25)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ s(sG,sG)
| p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_6)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ s(sG,f1(sG,sG))
| p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| q(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,f1(sG,sG))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_2)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ s(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| ~ s(sG,sG)
| s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_21)]) ).
cnf(g13,plain,
( ~ s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| s(sG,f1(sG,sG))
| q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(sG,f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_20)]) ).
cnf(g14,plain,
( ~ s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| s(sG,f1(sG,sG))
| q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_20)]) ).
cnf(g15,plain,
( ~ p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| s(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_14)]) ).
cnf(g16,plain,
( ~ p(f1(sG,sG),f1(sG,sG))
| ~ s(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| s(f1(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)),f1(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_15)]) ).
cnf(g17,plain,
( ~ s(f1(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)),f1(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)))
| ~ q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| s(sG,sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_27)]) ).
cnf(g18,plain,
( ~ q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| ~ q(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(sG,f1(f1(sG,sG),sG)))
| s(sG,sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_25)]) ).
cnf(g19,plain,
( ~ q(f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG),f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| ~ q(f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG),f1(sG,f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG)))
| s(sG,sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_25)]) ).
cnf(g20,plain,
( ~ s(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| q(f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG),f1(sG,f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_20)]) ).
cnf(g21,plain,
( ~ s(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| s(f1(sG,sG),f1(f1(sG,sG),sG))
| q(f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG),f1(f1(f1(sG,sG),sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_20)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07 % Problem : SYN039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.02/0.07 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.07/0.25 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.25 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.25 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.07/0.25 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 16:36:09 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.27 % symbols: 6
% 0.11/0.27 % clauses: 27
% 0.11/0.27 % start clauses: 2
% 0.11/0.27 % iterative deepening steps: 148
% 0.11/0.27 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.11/0.27 % literal attempts: 32564
% 0.11/0.27 % depth failures: 26461
% 0.11/0.27 % regularity failures: 210
% 0.11/0.27 % tautology failures: 1342
% 0.11/0.27 % reductions: 2515
% 0.11/0.27 % extensions: 29827
% 0.11/0.27 % SAT variables: 1575
% 0.11/0.27 % SAT clauses: 5190
% 0.11/0.27 % WalkSAT solutions: 5185
% 0.11/0.27 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.11/0.27 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.27 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------