TSTP Solution File: SYN039-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:23:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.72s 1.94s
% Output   : Refutation 1.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   3 unt;   7 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (  18 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))
    | ~ s(A,f1(A,B))
    | q(f1(A,B),C) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))
    | ~ q(C,C)
    | ~ s(B,B) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ p(A,A)
    | ~ s(A,f1(A,B))
    | ~ s(B,B) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ p(A,A)
    | s(f1(A,B),C)
    | q(f1(A,B),D) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ p(A,A)
    | ~ q(B,B)
    | ~ q(C,f1(A,C)) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( s(A,B)
    | ~ s(B,f1(B,C))
    | ~ s(C,C) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ( s(A,B)
    | ~ q(C,C)
    | ~ q(D,f1(B,D)) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    ( p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))
    | s(f1(A,B),C)
    | q(f1(A,B),D) ),
    file('SYN039-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))
    | q(f1(A,B),C)
    | s(D,f1(A,B)) ),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[26,20,26])])]),
    [iquote('hyper,26,20,26,factor_simp,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(60,plain,
    ( p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))
    | q(f1(A,B),C) ),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[29,2])])]),
    [iquote('hyper,29,2,factor_simp,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ( p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))
    | s(C,D) ),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[60,23,60])]),
    [iquote('hyper,60,23,60,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(65,plain,
    p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B)),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[63,8,60])])]),
    [iquote('hyper,63,8,60,factor_simp,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(111,plain,
    ( s(f1(f1(A,B),C),D)
    | q(f1(f1(A,B),C),E) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[65,13]),
    [iquote('hyper,65,13')] ).

cnf(117,plain,
    q(f1(f1(A,B),C),D),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[111,11,65,111])]),
    [iquote('hyper,111,11,65,111,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(122,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[117,15,65,117]),
    [iquote('hyper,117,15,65,117')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SYN039-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:02:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.72/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.72/1.92  The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 1.72/1.92  Wed Jul 27 11:02:56 2022
% 1.72/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 20845.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.72/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.72/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))| -s(X,f1(X,X1))| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))| -s(X,f1(X,X1))|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))| -s(X,f1(X,X1))| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))|s(f1(X,X1),Z)| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))|s(f1(X,X1),Z)|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))|s(f1(X,X1),Z)| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))| -q(Z1,Z1)| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))| -q(Z1,Z1)|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] p(f1(X,X1),f1(X,X1))| -q(Z1,Z1)| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)| -s(X,f1(X,X1))| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)| -s(X,f1(X,X1))|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)| -s(X,f1(X,X1))| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)|s(f1(X,X1),Z)| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)|s(f1(X,X1),Z)|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)|s(f1(X,X1),Z)| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)| -q(Z1,Z1)| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)| -q(Z1,Z1)|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -p(X,X)| -q(Z1,Z1)| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)| -s(X,f1(X,X1))| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)| -s(X,f1(X,X1))|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)| -s(X,f1(X,X1))| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)|s(f1(X,X1),Z)| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)|s(f1(X,X1),Z)|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)|s(f1(X,X1),Z)| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)| -q(Z1,Z1)| -q(X1,f1(X,X1)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)| -q(Z1,Z1)|q(f1(X,X1),Z1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] s(Z,X)| -q(Z1,Z1)| -s(X1,X1).
% 1.72/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.72/1.92  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.72/1.92  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 1 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))| -s(A,f1(A,B))| -q(B,f1(A,B)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 2 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))| -s(A,f1(A,B))|q(f1(A,B),C).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 3 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))| -s(A,f1(A,B))| -s(B,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 4 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))|s(f1(A,B),C)| -q(B,f1(A,B)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 5 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))|s(f1(A,B),C)| -s(B,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 6 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))| -q(C,C)| -q(B,f1(A,B)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 7 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))| -q(C,C)|q(f1(A,B),C).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 8 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))| -q(C,C)| -s(B,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 9 [] -p(A,A)| -s(A,f1(A,B))| -q(B,f1(A,B)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 10 [] -p(A,A)| -s(A,f1(A,B))|q(f1(A,B),C).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 11 [] -p(A,A)| -s(A,f1(A,B))| -s(B,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 12 [] -p(A,A)|s(f1(A,B),C)| -q(B,f1(A,B)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 13 [] -p(A,A)|s(f1(A,B),C)|q(f1(A,B),D).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 14 [] -p(A,A)|s(f1(A,B),C)| -s(B,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 15 [] -p(A,A)| -q(B,B)| -q(C,f1(A,C)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 16 [] -p(A,A)| -q(B,B)|q(f1(A,C),B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 17 [] -p(A,A)| -q(B,B)| -s(C,C).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 18 [] s(A,B)| -s(B,f1(B,C))| -q(C,f1(B,C)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 19 [] s(A,B)| -s(B,f1(B,C))|q(f1(B,C),D).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 20 [] s(A,B)| -s(B,f1(B,C))| -s(C,C).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 21 [] s(A,B)|s(f1(B,C),A)| -q(C,f1(B,C)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 22 [] s(A,B)|s(f1(B,C),A)| -s(C,C).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 23 [] s(A,B)| -q(C,C)| -q(D,f1(B,D)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 24 [] s(A,B)| -q(C,C)|q(f1(B,D),C).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 25 [] s(A,B)| -q(C,C)| -s(D,D).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process sos:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 26 [] p(f1(A,B),f1(A,B))|s(f1(A,B),C)|q(f1(A,B),D).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 27 [] s(A,B)|s(f1(B,C),A)|q(f1(B,C),D).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.02 sec ----> 122 [hyper,117,15,65,117] $F.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 6.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.72/1.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.72/1.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.72/1.94  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ============ end of search ============
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.72/1.94  clauses given                  9
% 1.72/1.94  clauses generated            283
% 1.72/1.94  clauses kept                 121
% 1.72/1.94  clauses forward subsumed     188
% 1.72/1.94  clauses back subsumed         83
% 1.72/1.94  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.72/1.94  user CPU time          0.02          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.94  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.94  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Process 20845 finished Wed Jul 27 11:02:58 2022
% 1.72/1.94  Otter interrupted
% 1.72/1.94  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------