TSTP Solution File: SYN038-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SYN038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:56:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 4 unt; 7 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X,f(X,Y))
| ~ p(X,Y)
| q(Y,f(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X,Y)
| ~ q(Y,f(X,Y))
| p(X,f(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X,Y)
| ~ p(f(X,Y),f(X,Y))
| q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
( p(X,Y)
| p(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
( p(X,Y)
| ~ q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).
cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
( q(X,Y)
| q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X,Y)
| ~ q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(8,plain,
( q(X,Y)
| p(X,Y) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause_5,clause_6]) ).
cnf(9,plain,
( p(f(X,Y),f(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)))
| p(X,Y) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause_2,8,clause_4]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
( p(X,Y)
| q(f(X,Y),f(f(X,Y),f(X,Y))) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause_1,9,clause_4]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
( p(X,Y)
| p(f(f(X,Y),f(f(X,Y),f(X,Y))),f(f(X,Y),f(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)))) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause_7,11,8]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
( p(X,Y)
| q(f(f(X,Y),f(f(X,Y),f(X,Y))),f(f(X,Y),f(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)))) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause_3,13,9]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
p(X,Y),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause_7,18,11]) ).
cnf(22,plain,
q(f(X,Y),f(X,Y)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[clause_3,20]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
~ q(X,Y),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[clause_7,22]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[22,23]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:39:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T18:39:08
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T18:39:08
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 #||
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 ||#
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 51 formulas have been input or derived (from 14 formulas).
% 0.19/0.51 ; 24 (47%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.19/0.51 ; 21 (88%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.51 ; 3 (12%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Assert (7 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.003 9% Process new row (44 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Resolution (26 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (13 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (8 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Condensing (38 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Forward subsumption (38 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (19 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Clause clause subsumption (74 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Forward simplification (44 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Backward simplification (24 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (23 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.021 60% Other
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.035 Total
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.038 Real time
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; Term-hash-array has 29 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (19 at peak, 19 added, 19 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (61 at peak, 61 added, 60 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 101 possibly forward subsuming rows in 38 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 6 possibly backward subsumed rows in 19 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Path-index has 2 entries (27 at peak, 30 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Path-index has 248 nodes (404 at peak, 405 added, 157 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Trie-index has 2 entries (27 at peak, 30 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Trie-index has 7 nodes (503 at peak, 507 added, 500 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 5 generalization terms in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 9 instance terms in 4 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 230 unifiable terms in 77 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 1 with value 24 1 with value 62 1 with value 208
% 0.19/0.51 ; 1 with value 37
% 0.19/0.51 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 1 with value 4
% 0.19/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 1 with value (4 10)
% 0.19/0.51 Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.51 0.038 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.51 0.031977 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.51 0.006184 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.51 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.51 0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.51 3,115,232 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T18:39:08
% 0.19/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------